More Information

Submitted: 01 November 2019 | Approved: 11 December 2019 | Published: 12 December 2019

How to cite this article: El-Saedy MAM, Hammad SE, Awd Allah SFA. Nematicidal effect of abamectin, boron, chitosan, hydrogen peroxide and Bacillus thuringiensis against citrus nematode on Valencia orange trees. J Plant Sci Phytopathol. 2019; 3: 111-117.

DOI: 10.29328/journal.jpsp.1001041

ORCiD ID: 0000-0003-3811-783X

Copyright: © 2019 El-Saedy MAM, et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Keywords: Biocontrol; Oxamyl; Tylenchulus semipenetrans; Vydate® L; Yield; Fruit properties

 FullText PDF

Nematicidal effect of abamectin, boron, chitosan, hydrogen peroxide and Bacillus thuringiensis against citrus nematode on Valencia orange trees

MAM El-Saedy1, Sandy E Hammad2 and Sherin FA Awd Allah2*

1Department of Plant Pathology, Faculty of Agriculture, Alexandria University, Alexandria, Egypt
2Nematology Research Department, Plant Pathology Research Institute, Agricultural Research Center, Egypt

*Address for Correspondence: Sherin Fadel Awd Allah, Nematology Research Department, Plant Pathology Research Institute, Agricultural Research Center, Egypt, Tel: (+20) 11-5823-5078; Email: sherinfadel@gmail.com

The nematicidal efficacy of abamectin, boron, chitosan, hydrogen peroxide, Bacillus thuringiensis and oxamyl 24% SL against citrus nematode, Tylenchulus semipenetrans were examined on Valencia orange trees under field condition for two successive seasons (2017 and 2018). The experiment was conducted in a Valencia orange orchard infested with citrus nematode at Nubaria, El-Behera governorate, Egypt. The obtained results showed that all the tested treatments reduced nematode final population ((Pf) and reproduction factor (Rf) compared with that obtained from the untreated trees. The highest percentages of Pf reductions (74.5-83.4 %) and (70%-82%) were recorded with oxamyl, boron, abamectin, chitosan and H2O2 in the 1st and the 2nd tested seasons, respectively. Whereas, B. thuringiensis had the least nematode Pf reduction with 60.7 and 55.8% in the 1st and 2nd seasons, respectively. Additionally, all treatments significantly improved orange yield (30.9-83.2% increase), physical fruit parameters and orange juice properties. The highest orange yield increase (83.2%) was recorded with boron treatment followed by oxamyl (70.3%). Also, boron increased total soluble solids (TSS) by 13.6%, volume of orange juice (36.4%) and vitamin C (19.7%) and decreased juice acidity (A) by (16.7%). It is concluded that abamectin, boron and the other tested compounds have potential as non-chemical control strategy tools in managing the citrus nematode. These bioagents reduced the amount of traditional chemical nematicides and are considered to be environmentally safe.

Egypt is the sixth largest orange producer and the second largest exporter in the world. Oranges represent the largest cultivated area of all citrus varieties in Egypt. Several orange varieties are produced in Egypt but Valencia and Navel orange are the main export varieties whereas others are more for domestic consumption. Orange production, in Egypt, has increased in the last years to meet the demand from local and foreign markets [1]. Many pathogens including plant-parasitic nematodes infect citrus and affect their quality and quantity [2]. The most widespread plant-parasitic nematodes in citrus orchard are Tylenchulus semipenetrans, Radopholus similis, Pratylenchus coffee and Meloidogyne spp. which cause significant economic losses worldwide [3].

Citrus nematode, T. semipenetrans is one of the major nematode pests that can induce considerable losses in citrus yield worldwide [4] and in Egypt [5,6].

Management of citrus nematode is very important and need more efforts using different tactics, e.g., site selection, using non-infected nursery stocks, using at least one post plant control tactic, and careful management of other elements of the environment that may stress the trees. Nowadays, there has been tremendous increase in public alertness on environmental pollution and climate change associated with pesticide toxicity and residues. Therefore, alternative methods for managing citrus nematode are highly encouraged and recommended.

Abamectin is a natural fermentation product of Streptomyces avermitilis. It is a mix of avermactin B1a (80%) and avermactin B1b (20%), which represent a new generation of pesticides that exhibit good efficacy against phytonematodes [7-10]. Abamectin applied as seed treatment, soil application and as root dipping against phytonematodes, e.g., Meloidogyne incognita, M. arenaria, M. javenica, T. semipenetrans and Rotylenchulus reniformis. It show good efficacy against nematodes and considered a new trend in the field of nematodes management [6,11-13].

Boron is one of the mineral nutrients which considered a micronutrient essential for plant growth as it plays a role in plant metabolism [14]. It also plays a major role in disease resistance and can improve crop yield and quality of cultivated crops [15]. El-Nagdi and Youssef, [16] and El-Saedy, et al. [17], reported that grape plants treated with boric acid improved grape yield and reduced root galls and egg masses numbers of root-knot nematode till harvest time.

Similarly, chitin and its derivatives, chitosan and oligochitosan are the well-known biocontrol and environmental agents be- cause of their nontoxic, biodegradable and biocompatible properties [18,19]. Chitosan has valuable nematistatic and nematicidal action used for disease management applications in agriculture. Many investigations confirmed the activity of chitosan against plant-parasitic nematodes [20-22].

Moreover, one of the novel trends in management of plant-parasitic nematodes is via hydrogen peroxide (H2O2) application. Ibrahim, et al. [23], studied the nematicidal properties of H2O2 at the concentrations of 100-2000 ppm against M. incognita and the potential for systemic resistance induction in sugar-beet. Results revealed that all tested concentrations were found to have nematicidal activity against nematode infection and improved plant growth parameters.

Also, the use of bio-management agents such as Bacillus thuringiensis is one of the untraditional microbes which have been reported to control different plant-parasitic nematodes [24-27].

Therefore, the present study was conducted in order to evaluate the efficacy of the five compounds; abamectin, boron, chitosan, H2O2 and B. thuringiensis as new alternative safe compounds for managing T. semipenetrans infesting orange trees soils and their effects on yield and fruit quality under field conditions.

The nematicidal effects of the five compounds namely, abamectin, boron, chitosan, H2O2, Bacillus thuringiensis and the chemical nematicide oxamyl 24% SL were examined against citrus nematode (Tylenchulus semipenetrans, Cobb) on orange trees (Citrus sinensis L.) cv. Valencia, under field conditions during 2017 and 2018 growing seasons in a private orchard infested with citrus nematode at Nubaria, El-Behera governorate, Egypt. Thirty five trees were selected randomly and assigned to a randomized complete blocks design (RCBD) with five replicates. The selected trees were nearly uniform in vigor and size and spaced at 4 × 5 m apart (200 trees/feddan). The applied treatments were carried out twice per season, at a depth of 10 cm from soil surface under dripper line. The 1st application was done at the begging of the experiment (in April) and the 2nd application after 3 months from the 1st application (in August). Fertilization, irrigation and other agricultural practices were applied according orange recommendations.

Orange trees were divided into 7 groups (treatments) of 5 trees each. The 1st group was treated with the commercial compound Tervigo® (Abamectin 2% SC) produced by Syngenta Agro Egypt, at the rate of 15 ml/ tree (recommended dose, 3 L/feddan). The 2nd group was treated with Maxboro B® ( Boron), produced by Egyptian International Company for Agricultural and Industrial Development, at the rate of 10 g/tree. The 3rd group was treated with Matador® (Chitosan 2.5 %, produced by Egy Chem, Pure Farma Company), at the rate of 20 ml/ tree (recommended dose, 4 L/feddan). The 4th group was treated with Huwa. San® (H2O2 50%), produced by Roam Chemie Company, NV Belgium, El-Ghonemy Group, at the rate of 20 ml / tree. The 5th group was treated with Agree® 50 WG contained Bacillus thuringiensis subsp. aizawai, strain GC-91 (spores and active toxins), produced by Certis Company, USA, at the rate of 20 g / tree. The 6th group was treated with Vydate® L (Oxamyl 24% SL) produced by DuPontTM Company, at the rate of 15 ml/tree (recommended dose, 3 L/feddan). The 7th group was left untreated to serve as a control treatment.

The population of T. semipenetrans in soil and roots were estimated during the 1st and 2nd growing seasons directly before application (Pi) and after treatments application ((Pf) at the harvest time. Samples from each replicate (approximately 1 kg soil and 30 g of root/ replicate) were collected from a depth of 20-30 cm of the orange rhizosphere. About 250 g soil from each sample was processed by sieving and decanting methods [28] and roots from the same soil sample were gently washed free of soil and about 10 g per tree was cut into 2 cm long pieces, placed in Baermann plates with tap water and incubated under laboratory conditions for two days to extract nematode juveniles [29]. After that, the roots segments were blended for 3 minutes to extract females from roots [30]. The reproduction factor (Rf) was calculated for each treatment by dividing Pf/Pi [31]. Reduction percentages (R) of T. semipenetrans Pf in soil and roots were determined and calculated using the formula of Mulla, et al. [32], as follow:

R = reduction % = 100 - [(C1/ T1) × (T2/C2) × 100].

Where: C1 = pre-treatment nematode density in control; C2=post-treatment nematode density in control habitat; T1 = pre-treatment nematode density in treatment habitat; T2 = post-treatment nematode density in treatment habitat.

Relative nematicide efficacy % (RNE) was calculated as follow:

RNA = [1-(Treatment – Nematicide)/Treatment] × 100.

At harvest time, at March, ten fruits from each tree were randomly selected to assess the physical and chemical characteristics of fruits and orange juice for both experimental seasons. Average fruit weight (g), yield/tree (kg/tree), fruit length (cm), fruit diameter (cm) and peel thickness (cm) were recorded. Juice volume, total soluble solids % (TSS), acidity % (A), TSS/A ratio and vitamin C content % were also recorded. TSS in fruit juice was recorded by using hand refractometer. Acidity was measured, as citric acid percent, by titration using 0.1 N sodium hydroxide. Vitamin C content % in orange juice was estimated by titration with 2, 6 dichlorophenol endophenol dye [33].

Statistical analysis

Analysis of variance (ANOVA) was carried out on the nematode final population ((Pf), the reproduction factor (Rf) of citrus nematode, orange yield, physical parameters of orange fruits and chemical properties of orange juice by using the statistical analysis system (SAS) software computer program 6.03 Edition-6th [34]. Means of treatments were compared with the value of revised LSD at 5% level of probability.

Data presented in table 1 indicated that all the tested applied compound treatments and oxamyl reduced the nematode population ((Pf) of T. semipenetrans infected Valencia orange trees in the 2017 and 2018 growing seasons under field conditions when compared with that obtained from the untreated trees. The highest effective treatments were oxamyl, boron, abamectin, chitosan and H2O2 which reduced nematode Pf by 74.5-83.4 % reduction in the 1st season. Similar results were obtained, in the 2nd season. Oxamyl, abamectin, boron and H2O2 treatments showed 72.7-82.0 % reduction followed by chitosan with 70 % reduction. Whereas, B. thuringiensis had the least nematode reduction Pf with 60.7% and 55.8% during the 1st and 2nd seasons, respectively.

Table 1: Effect of abamectin, boron, chitosan, H2O2, B. thuringiensis & oxamyl 24% SL applications on Tylenchulus semipenetrans infecting orange trees under field condition during 2017 and 2018 seasons.
Treatment Pi Pf R Rf RNE
1st season
Abamectin 10658  9254 c 79.7 0.9 cd 83.9
Boron 11428  9324 c 80.9 0.8 cd 83.3
Chitosan 10624 11572 c 74.5 1.2 c 67.1
H2O2 10708 10989 c 76.0 1.1 c 70.7
Bt 11144 18692 b 60.7 1.7 b 41.6
Oxamyl 10952  7768 c 83.4 0.7 d -
Untreated 10724 45772 a 0.00 4.3 a -
2nd season
Abamectin 11038  7654 d 80.3 0.7 cd 93.9
Boron 11768  8484 cd 79.5 0.7 cd 84.7
Chitosan 10964 11572 c 70.0 1.2 bc 62.1
H2O2 11068 10609 cd 72.7 1.0 cd 67.8
Bt 11544 17932 b 55.8 1.6 b 40.1
Oxamyl 11352  7188 d 82.0 0.6 d -
Untreated 10004 35169 a 0.00 3.8 a -
Data are average of 5 replicates; values within each column, in each season, followed by the same letter(s) are not significantly different at p = 0.05; Bt: Bacillus thuringiensis; Pi: nematode initial population of J2/ kg soil + J2; and females/10 g root fresh weight; Pf: nematode final population of J2/kg soil + J2 and females/10 g root fresh weight; R: reduction % was calculated using Mulla formula; (R = 100 - [(C1/ T1) × (T2/C2) × 100]); Rf= nematode reproduction factor = (Pf/Pi) , RNE: Relative Nematicidal Efficacy = [1- (Treatment – Nematicide) / Treatment] ×100.

According to relative nematicidal efficacy % (RNE), the obtained results indicated that abamectin and boron treatments had the highest RNE, in both seasons, with 83.9 and 83.3% reduction, in the 1st season and 93.9 and 84.7 % in the 2nd season followed by H2O2 and chitosan with 70.7 and 67.1 % in the 1st season and 67.8 and 62.1 % in the 2nd season, respectively. Meanwhile, B. thuringiensis gave the lowest RNE in both seasons with 41.6 and 40.1 % in the 1st and 2nd seasons, respectively (Table 1).

Many reports showed that abamectin was able to reduce plant-parasitic nematode populations on several crops [10,13,27,35,36]. Our obtained result of the present work was confirmed by El-Nagdi, et al. [25]. They found that abamectin reduced the soil population of T. semipenetrans in mandarins up to 86% and 93% in the 1st and 2nd seasons, respectively. Abamectin is a new generation of nematicides that considered a new tool in the field of plant parasitic nematodes management. Abamectin have a unique mode of action in comparison with traditional nematicides. It is targeted the δ- amino-butyric acid in nematode receptors causing increments in the permeability of chloride ions which finally causing death [37]. The effect of abamectin against T. semipenetrans in our study may be attributed to the strong adsorption of abamectin on soil particles which help abamectin to stay in direct contact for more time with the nematode population [38-40]. Furthermore, abamectin causes immobility in second stage juveniles (J2) of root knot nematode and this may correlate with a reduction in oxygen uptake [27].

As well, boron element used nowadays as a control agent against phytonematodes and some studies clarified that boron plays a real role in reducing root-knot nematode densities in soil and roots [17].

Similarly, chitosan has been used to encourage the immunity of plants and to protect plants from phytonematodes and other pathogens. Aboud, et al. [20] reported that chitosan reduced phytonematode invasion and affected the morphophysiological and population parameters of M. incognita. The efficacy of chitosan treatment possibly refers to encourage systemic acquired resistance in plants and may serve as a natural nematicide [21].

Likewise, the bioagent, B. thuringiensis is one of the untraditional microbes used against different genera of plant nematodes especially root-knot nematodes. B. thuringiensis produce parasporal crystalline proteinaceous inclusions or δ - endotoxins which are toxic to parasitic nematodes [24,25,27,41-43]. Our results confirmed the nematicidal potential of B. thuringiensis against T. semipenetrans and are in agreement with results of El-Nagdi, et al. [25], who found that the best phytonematde control was achieved with using the highest rate of B. thuringiensis, in balady mandarin orchard than the low rate.

Similar to the present results, many previous studies recorded the killing ability of hydrogen peroxide (H2O2) produced by some microorganisms or applied exogenously on nematodes [44-46]. It considered a stress signal in plants, mediating adaptive responses to various stresses. Exposure to various abiotic and biotic stresses results in the accumulation of H2O2 [47]. The effect of H2O2 against citrus nematodes in the current study may be refer to that H2O2 can induce genes expression that involved in antioxidant defense [48,49].

The effect of abamectin, boron, chitosan, H2O2, B. thuringiensis and oxamyl 24% SL applications on Valencia orange fruit yield was shown in table 2. Results showed that all the tested treatments increased orange yield by 30.9-83.2 %. The highest yield increase (83.2 %) was recorded with boron treatment application followed by oxamyl (70.3%) then abamectin and B. thuringiensis with 45.4 and 42.5 % increase, respectively. The lowest yield increase of 30.9 and 35% were recorded with H2O2 and chitosan treatment applications, respectively.

Table 2: Effect of abamectin, boron, chitosan, H2O2, B. thuringiensis & oxamyl 24% SL applications on average of orange yield and physical characteristics of fruits and increase % during 2017 and 2018 seasons.
Treatment Yield/tree (kg) I Fruit
Weight (g) I Length (cm) I Diameter (cm) I Peel thickness (cm) I
Abamectin 71.1 c 45.4 178.8 bc 28.6 7.4 bc 32.1 6.7 b 28.8 0.4 ab 100.0
Boron 89.6 a 83.2 191.3 a 37.6 7.4 bc 32.1 6.7 b 28.8 0.3 bc -
Chitosan 66.0 d 35.0 167.5 c 20.5 7.4 bc 32.1 6.6 b 26.9 0.3 bc -
H2O2 64.0 d 30.9 167.0 c 20.1 7.1 c 26.8 6.5 b 25.0 0.3 bc -
Bt 69.7 c 42.5 170.3 c 22.5 7.5 b 33.9 6.7 b 28.8 0.4 ab 100.0
Oxamyl 83.3 b 70.3 186.3 ab 34.0 8.1 a 44.6 7.3 a 40.4 0.5 a 150.0
Untreated 48.9 e - 139.0 d - 5.6 d - 5.2 c - 0.2 c -
Means within each column with the same letter(s) are not significantly different at p = 0.05, Bt: Bacillus thuringiensis; I: Increase; %: [(Treatment-Control)/Control] ×100.

Moreover, data in table 2 showed that all treatments increased weight, length and diameter of fruits by 20.1-37.6, 26.8-44.6 and 25% - 40.4%, respectively. The highest fruit weight increase percentages of 34% and 37.6% were recorded with boron and oxamyl treatments followed by the other treatment applications with 20.1% - 28.6% increase. Also, oxamyl were recorded the highest increase of fruit length and diameter by 44.6% and 40.4%, consecutively. Whereas, oxamyl, abamectin and B. thuringiensis increased orange fruit peel thickness by 100% - 150% increase.

However, at the harvest time, in both seasons, all the tested treatments significantly increased the orange juice volume and its chemical properties, e.g., total soluble salts (TSS), TSS/ A (acidity) ratio and Vitamin C and decreased juice acidity (A) compared to the untreated trees fruits (Table 3).

Table 3: Effect of abamectin, boron, chitosan, H2O2, B. thuringiensis & oxamyl 24% SL applications on average of orange juice volume, its chemical properties and change % during 2017 and 2018 seasons.
Treatment Juice volume (ml) I TSS % I Acidity % (A) D TSS/A I Vitamin C (mg/100 ml) I
Abamectin 92.5 ab 29.4 10.4 bcd - 1.3 b 9.4 8.3 c 15.7 45.1 bc -
Boron 97.5 ab 36.4 11.1 a 13.6 1.1 c 16.7 9.7 a 35.3 50.4 a 19.7
Chitosan 83.0 bc - 10.9 ab 11.2 1.2 bc 12.4 9.0 ab 26.3 48.7 ab 15.7
H2O2 81.3 bc - 10.1 cd - 1.2 bc 10.9 8.2 c 15.3 44.1 bc -
Bt 85.8 bc - 10.5 bc 6.6 1.2 bc 10.9 8.5 bc 19.0 45.3 abc -
Oxamyl 105.3 a 47.3 10.3 cd - 1.3 b 8.0 8.1 c 13.2 46.9 abc -
Control 71.5 c -  9.8 d - 1.4 a - 7.1 d - 42.1 c -
Means within each column with the same letter (s) are not significantly different at level. p = 0.05, Bt: Bacillus thuringiensis; TSS: Total Soluble Solids; A:  Acidity; I: Increase; %:  [(Treatment-Control)/Control] ×100; D: Decrease; %: [(Control-Treatment)/Control] ×100.

Data also showed that oxamyl, boron and abamectin treatment applications increased juice volume by 47.3, 36.4% and 29.4% compared with the untreated tree fruits, respectively. Similarly, TSS was increased with boron and chitosan treatments by 13.6% and 11.2%, respectively followed by B. thuringiensis with 6.6% increase. TSS/A ratio was also increased with all treatment applications. The highest TSS/A increase of 35.3% and 26.3% was recorded with boron and chitosan treatments, respectively followed by the other tested treatments with 13.2% - 19% increase. On the other hand, acidity (A) of orange juice was decreased with all treatments by 8% - 16.7%. The highest decrease of 16.7 % was recorded with boron treatment compared with untreated trees fruits (Table 3). Data indicated also that Vitamin C contents % was increased with boron and chitosan treatments with 19.7 and 15.7% compared with the untreated fruits, consecutively.

Results of the present study are in the same trend with those reported by El-Nagdi, et al. [25], D’Errico, et al. [50], and El-Tanany, et al. [6]. Our results are in agreement with those given by El-Nagdi, et al, [25], who found that the B. thuringiensis (Agerin®) and abamectin (Vertemic®) significantly suppressed the population of T. semipenetrans and improved nutritional status. They also found that these treatments increased fruit yield expressed as fruit number or weight compared to untreated control and markedly improved fruit quality of mandarin trees. It was concluded that these two bio-agents also have low associated production costs and are considered to be environmentally safe. Also, D’Errico, et al. [50] reported that abamectin effective in vivo for controlling M. incognita-infected tomatoes and they also found that no visual phytotoxicity symptoms were detected for the products.

Similarly, our results regarding growth parameters and juice properties are in conformity with those obtained by Radwan, [51], Ibrahim, et al. [52], Khan, et al. [53], Khalil, et al. [54], Khalil, [9], Saad, et al. [8] and Muzhandu, et al. [39] and El-Tanany, et al. [6]. They reported that the detected improvement in trees nutrient status followed by B. thuringiensis and abamectin treatment application might be explained by faster absorption of nutrients via the existence of new normal roots. Meanwhile, El-Nagdi, et al. [25], found that both B. thuringiensis and abamectin significantly increased TSS and ascorbic acid content of mandarin juice. They also found that B. thuringiensis significantly increased shoot system indices. Moreover, abamectin enhanced the shoot and root length and fresh weight of tomato plants.

El-Tanany, et al. [6] reported that soil application with oxamyl increased all fruit physical properties of Valencia orange fruits. Conversely, peel thickness had the lowest values with oxamyl treatment. They also found that oxamyl and/or abamectin were the efficient treatments to reduce the citrus nematode population densities in soil and significantly enhanced fruit yield expressed as weights or numbers. Moreover, oxamyl treatment improved all physical fruit properties and fruit juice content of TSS, as well as increased leaf macro nutrient content. While, abamectin increased juice acidity and vitamin C.

In accordance with our data, some researchers indicated that application of mineral fertilizer decreasing the need for chemical control in some cases. Partially, applying fertilizer can offset nematode-induced damage by stimulating plant development [55]. Likewise, Santana-Gomes, et al. [56] reported that phytonematodes are among the pathogens that can be affected by plant nutrition. The balanced application between macro and micronutrients is the best way of ensuring that the crop is able to tolerate the damage caused by phytopathogens.

Boron is one of the essential micronutrient required for normal growth of most crops. It is necessary for growth of pollen tubes during pollination and increases pollen grain germination and pollen tube elongation which increase the percentages of the fruit set and consequently the yield [57]. Moreover, Edward Raja, [58] found that micronutrients (e.g. zinc and boron) that used in citrus fruit crop is important for growth, yield and quality. The enhancement of growth following the treatment with boron may be attributed to possible effects in plays an important role in movement of natural hormones and encouragement of both cell division and cell enlargement [17].

Our finding is in agreement with earlier observations made by many scientists who confirmed that chitosan enhanced the growth parameters of plants. Chitosan has been used to increase the plant product, to stimulate the immunity of plants and to protect plants from microorganisms infections. A positive effect of chitosan was observed on the growth of roots, shoots, and leaves of several crop plants [21,59-61]. Khalil and Badawy, [21] showed that chitosan treatment improved the growth of tomato seedling compared with the check plants.

Generally, results demonstrated that abamectin, boron and the other tested compounds have a significant nematicidal activity against citrus nematode. In addition, these applications significantly increased fruit yield and markedly improved fruit quality of orange trees compared to untreated trees control. Moreover, all the applied compounds considered promising environmentally safe alternatives to manage citrus nematode and reducing the amount of traditional chemical nematicides.

  1. Omar Shaza, Tate B. Egypt, Egyptian orange Exports continue to expand. USDA Foreign Agricultural Service, Global Agricultural Information Network, Gain Report Number: EG 18031. 2018; 10.
  2. Ahmad MS, Mukhtar T, Ahmad R. Some studies on the control of citrus nematode (Tylenchulus semipenetrans) by extracts of three plants and their effects on plant growth variables. Asian J Plant Sciences. 2004; 3: 544-548.
  3. Verdejo-Lucas S, Mc Kenry MV. Management of the citrus nematode, Tylenchulus semipenetrans. J Nematol. 2004; 36: 424-432. PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19262822
  4. Sorribas FJ, Verdejo-Lucas S, Pastor J, Ornat C, Pons J, et al. Population densities of Tylenchulus semipenetrans related to physicochemical properties of soil and yield of Clementine mandarin in Spain. Plant Dis. 2008; 92: 445-450. PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30769676
  5. Abd-Elgawad MM, Duncan LW, Koura FHF, Abd El-Wahab AE, Montasser SA, et al. Management revision and observations on Tylenchulus semipenetrans on citrus yield in Egypt. Egypt Journal of Agronematol. 2011; 10: 64-77.
  6. El-Tanany MM, El-Shahaat MS, Khalil MS. Efficacy of three bio-pesticides and oxamyl against citrus nematode (Tylenchulus semipenetrans) and on productivity of Washington navel orange trees. Egyptian Journal of Horticulture. 2018; 45: 275-287.
  7. Pitterna T, Cassayre J, HـTER OF, Jung PM, Maienfisch P, et al. New ventures in the chemistry of avermectins. Bioorg Med Chem. 2009; 17: 4085-4095. PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19168364
  8. Saad ASA, Massoud MA, Ibrahim HS, Khalil MS. Activity of nemathorin, natural product and bioproducts against root-knot nematodes on tomatoes. Arch Phytopathol Plant Prot. 2012; 45: 955-962.
  9. Khalil MS. Abamectin and azadirachtin as eco-friendly promising biorational tools in integrated nematodes management programs. J Plant Pathology Microb. 2013; 4: 174.
  10. Saad ASA, Radwan MA, Mesbah HA, Ibrahim HS, Khalil MS. Evaluation of some non-fumigant nematicides and the biocide avermectin for managing Meloidogyne incognita in tomatoes. Pakistan Journal of Nematology. 2017; 35: 85-92.
  11. El-Nagdi WMA. Studies on banana nematodes in Egypt. Ph.D. Thesis, Faculty of Agriculture, Cairo University, Cairo, Egypt. 2001; 178.
  12. Youssef MMA, El-Nagdi WMA, Kassim FSE, El-Kholy LAF, Saleh MMS. Nematicidal and horticultural evaluation of sea ambrosia (Ambrosia maritima) plant and abamectin on banana infested by Meloidogyne incognita. Egyptian Journal of Agriculture Research NRC. 2005; 2: 411-429.
  13. Radwan MA, Saad ASA, Mesbah HA, Ibrahim HS, Khalil MS. Investigating the in vitro and in vivo nematicidal performance of structurally related macrolides against the root-knot nematode, Meloidogyne incognita. Hellenic Plant Protection Journal. 2019; 12: 24-37.
  14. Intikhab AJ, Shabir HW, Bhatt MA, Hussain A, Raja W, et al. Micronutrients for Crop Production: Role of Boron. Int J Current Microbiology Applied Sciences. 2017; 6: 5347-5353.
  15. Preethi M, Prakash DP, Kulapati Hipparagi IB, Biradar SG, Gollagi, et al. Effect of Quantity of Soil Application of Zinc, Boron and Iron on Growth and Yield in Papaya cv. Red Lady. Int J Curr Microbiol App Sci. 2017; 6: 2081-2086.
  16. El-Nagdi WM, Youssef MM. Effect of certain medicinal plant extracts, a bioicde and a biofertilizer for controlling Meloidogyne incognita infesting grapevines in Egypt. International Journal of Nematology. 2009; 19: 40-46.
  17. El-Saedy MAM, El-Sayed MEA, Hammad SE. Efficacy of boron, silicon, jojoba and four bio-products on controlling Meloidogyne incognita infecting Thompson seedless grapevines. American-Eurasian Journal of Agriculture & Environmental Sciences. 2015; 15: 1710-1720.
  18. Mack I, Hector A, Ballbach M, Kohlhaufl J, Fuchs KJ, et al. The role of chitin, chitinases, and chitinase-like proteins in pediatric lung diseases. Mol Cell Pediatr. 2015; 2: 3. PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26542293
  19. Hassan O, Chang T. Chitosan for eco-friendly control of plant disease. Asian Journal of Plant Pathology. 2017; 11: 53-70.
  20. Aboud HM, Fattah FA, Al-Heeti AA, Saleh HM. Efficiency of chitosan in inducing systemic acquired resistance against the root-knot nematode (Meloidogyne javanica (Treub) (Chitwood) on tomato. Arab Journal of Plant Protection. 2002; 20: 93–98.
  21. Khalil MS, Badawy MEI. Nematicidal activity of a biopolymer chitosan at different molecular weights against root-knot nematode, Meloidogyne incognita. Plant Protection Science. 2012; 48: 170-178.
  22. El-Sayed SM, Mahdy ME. Effect of chitosan on root-knot nematode, Meloidogyne javanica on tomato plants. Int J Chem Tech Res. 2015; 7: 1985-1992.
  23. Ibrahim, Dina SS, Nour El-Deen AH, Khalil AE, Fatma AMM. Induction of systemic resistance in sugar-beet infected with Meloidogyne incognita by humic acid, hydrogen peroxide, thiamine and two amino acids. Egypt J Agronematol. 2013; 12: 22-41.
  24. Hammad Sandy EI. Isolation and identification of Bacillus thuringiensis toxins and their role in controlling root-knot nematode on eggplants. Ph.D. Thesis. Faculty of Agriculture, El-Shateby, Alexandria University Egypt. 2005; 116.
  25. El-Nagdi WMA, Yossef MMA, Hafez OM. Effects of commercial formulations of Bacillus thuringiensis and Streptomyces avermitilis on Tylenchulus semipenetrans and on nutrition status, yield and fruit quality of mandarin. Nematologia Mediterrania. 2010; 38: 147-157.
  26. Hammam MMA, El-Nagdi WM, Abd-Elgawad MMM. Biological and chemical control of the citrus nematode, Tylenchulus semipenetrans (Cobb, 1913) on mandarin in Egypt. Egyptian Journal of Biological Pest Control. 2016; 26: 345-349.
  27. Khalil MS, Abd El-Naby SSI. The integration efficacy of formulated abamectin, Bacillus thuringiensis and Bacillus subtilis for managing Meloidogyne incognita (Kofoid and White) Chitwood on tomatoes. J Biopesticides. 2018; 11: 146-153.
  28. Barker KR. Sampling nematode communities. In: An advanced treatise on Meloidogyne, Vol. II, Methodology, Barker, K. R., Carter, C. C. & Sasser, J. N. (Ed.), Graphics, North Carolina State University Raleigh, USA. 1985; 3-17.
  29. Ayoub SM. Plant nematology, an agricultural training aid. Secramanto, California, USA, Nema aid Publications. 1980; 195.
  30. Southey JF. Laboratory methods for work with plant and soil nematodes. Tech Bull Ministry of Agriculture, Fishers and Food, London. 1970; 176.
  31. Oostenbrink M. Major characteristics of the relation between nematodes and plants. Mededelingen van Landlouwhogesch, Wageningen, The Netherlands. 1966; 46.
  32. Mulla MS, Norland L, Fanara DM, Darwazeh HA, McKean DW. Control of Chironomid midges in recreational lakes. J Economic Entomology. 1971; 64: 300-307.
  33. A.O.A.C. Official methods of analysis of the Association of Official Analytical Chemists. 16th Ed., AOAC International, Washington DC, USA. 1995; 490-510.
  34. SAS Institute. SAS/STAT User's Guide. Release 6.03 Edition-6th edition. SAS Institute Inc., North Carolina, Cary. Inc 27512-8000. 1997; 1028.
  35. Khalil AE, Nour El-Deen AH, Mahmoud NA. Evaluate the effectiveness of various nematicides and bio-agents in controlling nematode diseases on certain fruit crops under Ismailia governorate conditions in Egypt. Egypt. J Agronematology. 2012a ; 11: 320-332.
  36. El-Nagdi WMA, Hafez OM, Saleh MA. Impact of a biocide abamectin for controlling of plant parasitic nematodes, productivity and fruit quality of some date palm cultivars. Science of Agriculture. 2015; 11: 20-25.
  37. Martin RJ, Robertson AP, Wolstenholme AJ. Mode of action of the macrocyclic lactones. In: Vercruysse J, Rew RS (Eds) Macrocyclic lactones in antiparasitic therapy. United Kingdom, Wallingford. 2002; 125–162.
  38. Huang WK, Sun JH, Cui JK, Wang GF, Kong LA, et al. Efficacy evaluation of fungus Syncephalastrum racemosum and nematicide avermectin against the root-knot nematode Meloidogyne incognita on cucumber. PLoS One. 2014; 9: e89717. PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24586982
  39. Muzhandu RT, Chinheya CC, Dimbi S, Manjeru P. Efficacy of abamectin for the control of root-knot nematodes in tobacco seedling production in Zimbabwe. African Journal of Agricultural Research. 2014; 9: 144-147.
  40. Lopez-Perez JA, Edwards S, Ploeg A. Control of root-knot nematodes on tomato in stone wool substrate with biological nematicides. J Nematol. 2011; 43: 110-117. PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22791920
  41. Kotze AC, Grady O, Gough J, Pearson JM, Bagnall R, Kemp DH, et al. Toxicity of Bacillus thuringiensis to parasitic and free-living life stages of nematodes parasites of livestock. Int J Parasitol. 2005; 35: 1013-1022. PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15964574
  42. Iatsenko I, Boichenko I, Sommer RJ. Bacillus thuringiensis DB27 produces two novel protoxins, Cry21Fa1 and Cry21Ha1, which act synergistically against nematodes. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2014; 80: 3266-3275. PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24632254
  43. Awd-Allah SFA, El-Sherbiny AA. Non-chemical control of Heterodera golden and Meloidogyne incognitaon rice plants using residues of Oyster mushroom cultivation and supernatant of Bacillus thuringiensis before transplanting under field microplot conditions. Egyptian J Agronematology. 2015; 14: 62-77.
  44. Gustin EJ, McDonnell GE, Mullen G, Gordon BE. The efficacy of vapor phase hydrogen peroxide against nematode infestation of the Caenohabditis elegans model. 27–31 October 2002, 53rd AALAS National Meeting, San Antonio, Texas, USA. 2002.
  45. Jansen WT, Bolm M, Balling R, Chhatwal GS, Schnabel R. Hydrogen peroxide-mediated killing of Caenorhabditis elegans by Streptococcus pyogenes. Infect Immun. 2002; 70: 5202–5207. PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/12183571
  46. Bolm M, Wouter T, Jansen M, Schnabel R, Chatwal GS. Hydrogen peroxide-mediated killing of Caenorhabditis elegans: a common feature of different Streptococcal species. Infect Immun. 2004; 72: 1192–1194. PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/14742574
  47. Desikan R, Soheila A, Mackerness H, Hancock JT, Neill SJ. Regulation of the Arabidopsis transcriptome by oxidative stress. Plant Physiol. 2001; 127: 159–172. PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/11553744
  48. Lopez-Huertas E, Charlton WL, Johnson B, Graham IA, Baker A. Stress induces peroxisome biogenesis genes. EMBO J. 2000; 19: 6770–6777. PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/11118212
  49. Jaiti F, Dihazi A, El-Hadrami A, El-Hassni M, El-Hadrami I. Effect of exogenous application of jasmonic acid on date plam defense reaction agnst Fusarium oxysporum f. sp. albedinis. Phytopathologia Mediterranea. 2004; 43: 325–331.
  50. D’Errico G, Marra R, Vinale F, Landi S, Roversi PF, et al. Nematicidal efficacy of new abamectin-based products used alone and in combination with indole butyric acid against the root-knot nematode Meloidogyne incognita. J Zoology. 2017; 100: 95-101.
  51. Radwan MA. Bioactivity of commercial products of Bacillus thuringiensis on Meloidogyne incognita infecting tomato. Ind J Nematol. 2007; 37: 30-33.
  52. Ibrahim HS, Saad ASA, Massoud MA, Khalil MSH. Evaluation of certainagrochemicals and biological agents against Meloidogyne incognita on tomatoes. Alexandria Science Exchange Journal. 2010; 31: 10-17.
  53. Khan MQ, Abbasi MW, Zaki MJ, Khan SA. Evaluation of Bacillus thuringiensis isolates against root-knot nematodes following seed application in okra and mungbean. Pakistan J Botany. 2010; 42: 2903-2910.
  54. Khalil MSH, Allam AFG, Barakat AST. Nematicidal activity of some biopesticide agents and microorganisms against root-knot nematode on tomato plants under greenhouse conditions. J Plant Protection Research. 2012b; 52: 47-52.
  55. Ferraz S, Freitas LG, Lopes EA, Dias-Arieira CR. Manejo sustentável de fitonematoides. Viçosa: Editora UFV. 2010; 306.
  56. Santana-Gomes SM, Dias-Arieira CR, Roldi M, Dadazio TS, Marini PM, et al. Mineral nutrition in the control of nematodes. African Journal of Agricultural Research. 2013; 8: 2413-2420.
  57. Abd-Allah AS. Effect of spraying some macro and micro nutrients on fruit set, yield and fruit quality of Washington Navel orange trees. J Appl Sci Res. 2006; 2: 1059-1063.
  58. Edward Raja M. Importance of micronutrients in the changing horticultural scenario in India. J Horticulture Science. 2009; 4: 1-27.
  59. Chibu H, Shibayama H. Effects of chitosan applications on the growth of several crops. In: Uragami T., Kurita K., Fukamizo T. (eds.): Chitin and Chitosan in Life Science. Proceedings 8th International Chitin and Chitosan Conference, Yamaguchi, September 2000, Kodansha Scientific Ltd., Tokyo. 2001; 235–239.
  60. No HK, Lee KS, Kim ID, Park MJ, Kim SD, et al. Chitosan treatment affects yield, ascorbic acid content, and hardness of soybean sprouts. J Food Sci. 2003; 68: 680–685.
  61. Nge KL, New N, Chandrkrachang S, Stevens WF. Chitosan as a growth stimulator in orchid tissue culture. Plant Science. 2006; 170: 1185–1190.