SARS-CoV-2 Infection, COVID-19, and long covid: Saga of erratic immune response, waning immunity, and immune system failure

Introduction - evolution of SARS-CoV-2 variants: With the unrestrained pandemic for over last one-and- half year, SARS-CoV-2 seems to have adapted to its habitat, the human host, through mutations that facilitate its replication and transmission. The G variant incorporating D614G mutation, potently more transmissible than the ancestral virus arose during January 2020 and spread widely. Since then, various SARS-CoV-2 variants of concern (VOCs) and variants of interest (VOIs) with higher infectivity


Emerging SARS-CoV-2 variants
The Pandemic and Evolution of D614G or G Variant: The mutation process is a natural characteristic of the lifespan of a virus. Over time, the viruses replicate and mutate into more transmissible but less virulent forms to persist inside the host and extend their lifespan. Apparently, the transmissibility and virulence may have an inversely proportional relationship, and in general, the viral mutations lead to higher transmissibility and lower virulence. In other words, with ongoing evolution a virus tends to become more transmissible but less lethal. A particular variant may have higher transmission potential if the infected hosts are shedding more virus. The natural selection appears to act on variation in viral transmission potential and not variation in virulence, per se. There is a probability, though, the virus may evolve to become more virulent, causing more severe disease and host mortality. However, a more severe infection may reduce contact rates of infected individuals, limiting the opportunity for viral transmission.
Over last one-and-half year, SARS-CoV-2 seems to have adapted to its habitat, the human host, through mutations that facilitate its replication and transmission [1]. One widespread and more transmissible variant than the ancestral virus is D614G or G variant in which aspartic acid (D) had been replaced with glycine (G) at amino acid position 614 in the S protein ( Figure 1).
There is likelihood that the G variant arose during January 2020 in early phase of epidemic in China and became dominant worldwide. The D-to-G substitution appears to have resulted in more ef icient infection, replication, and enhanced transmission. The observed increased frequency of infection with SARS-CoV-2 G variant is consistent with the selective advantage for the virus. Further, the D614G form is associated with higher viral loads and younger patient age, though there is no association of with increased severity of infection [2]. In fact, the S protein is made up of three smaller peptides which bind to the ACE2 receptors. The peptides are in open or closed orientation, with the open orientation facilitating their binding with the receptors. The D614 G mutation seems to relax the connexions between the peptides and favouring the receptor bonding and cellular internalization.
The D614G mutation in the S glycoprotein of SARS-CoV-2 was irst identi ied in virus sequences in several Chinese provinces in late January, and later detected in early March 2020 at other places. By June 2020, the G variant replaced the ancestral virus to become the dominant form globally [3]. Further, the mutation seems to have arisen independently and simultaneously across multiple geographic regions, which is suggestive of natural selection and an adaptive bene it of D614G for the virus. As observed, the mutation leads to increased infectivity and transmission than the ancestral virus with 614D but neither causes a more severe illness nor impacts the effectiveness of lab tests, therapies, and vaccines [2]. The G variant, which originally emerged in China, has subsequently spread around the world. The D614G's spike protein sequence has been used to develop the vaccines in use presently.
Going through the progression of the SAR-CoV-2 infection, it originally started with the L strain that appeared in Wuhan in December 2019. Its irst mutation, the S strain appeared at the beginning of 2020, which mutated to G strain by mid-January 2020. The G strain has mutated further into sub-strains GR and GH at the end of February 2020. Presently, the G, GR and GH forms are by far the most widespread and encompass for about 74% of all gene sequences henceforth analysed [4].
The ongoing evolution of SARS-CoV-2 virus: Various SARS-CoV-2 variants of concern (VOCs) have evolved on the background of D614G mutation which arose during January 2020 and spread widely replacing the ancestral virus. During September-October 2020, a new SARS-CoV-2 lineage, B.1.1.7 (Alpha variant), having substantial itness advantages over other circulating lineages, rapidly spread from the UK to various countries around the globe. More recently, the SARS-CoV-2 lineage, B.1.617.2 was irst detected in India in late 2020 (named Delta variant by WHO later on 31 May 2021), has led to widespread resurgence, and subsequently has spread to other countries. The Delta variant has mutations such as the substitutions T478K, P681R and L452R in the S protein, which lead to higher transmissibility and reduced neutralization by antibodies for previously circulating variants of the COVID-19 virus [5]. Further, its secondary attack rates are stated to be 51% -67% higher than the Alpha variant, apart from the fatality rate being about 1.9% higher than the Alpha variant [6]. Other VOCs are Beta (B.1.351), Gamma (P.1), and Alpha (B.1.1.7) with E484K. In addition, there are certain variants of interest, such as Epsilon, Zeta, Eta, Theta, Iota, and Kappa. The virus SARS-CoV-2, thus, has the capacity to evolve into more ef icient variants ( Figure 2). A s SARS-CoV-2 continues to spread, the new variants are developing under evolutionary pressures such as host immunity as the result of infection or vaccination, chronicity of SARS-CoV-2 infection, partial and erratic immunity, and perhaps genetic variations in various races and human population groups. There is emerging evidence to suggest that some SARS-CoV-2 variants may carry enhanced antigenicity, leading to likely build-up of differential herd immunity among population groups through natural infection or vaccination. On the other hand, the emergent SARS-CoV-2 lineages may potentially escape vaccine or natural immunity. Additionally, carrier state for inde inite period in those exposed to infection and animal reservoirs may develop to complicate the dynamics of SARS-CoV-2 evolution and adaptation.

SARS-CoV-2 and host immunodynamics
Viral evolution, transmissibility and virulence: In general, as the virus becomes more transmissible, its lethality may drop. Further, there is evidence to show that the T-cell recognition from a previous SARS-CoV-2 infection or vaccination may be able to deal partially with the new variants in terms of modi ied disease transmission and clinical manifestations. Thus, it is being presumed that the neutralizing effect of T-cells within the population as well as the diminishing lethality of the virus may lower down the infection rate in due course. There are reasons to believe that intermediate levels of immunity generated through natural infection or vaccination may reduce the probability of infection as well as limit the evolution of adaptive mutations by restricting the viral population size within vaccinated hosts. Furthermore, viral loads are lower in infections 12 to 28 days after a single dose of vaccine than in unvaccinated individuals, indicating diminished likelihood of transmission by vaccinated individuals [7]. Similarly, the vaccination is likely to slow the viral evolution. Thus, reducing numbers of infections through vaccination could reduce the chances for variants to be generated, selected, and transmitted [8]. In fact, there is likelihood of emergence rate of immune-escape variants being mitigated by reduced opportunities of the con luence of mutation, selection, and transmission following widespread vaccination.
But the issues related to evolutionary dynamics of SARS-CoV-2 as well as host's im munodynamics are intricate and full of uncertainties. There is possibility that the SARS-CoV-2 vaccine dosing regimens generating intermediate levels of immunity could accelerate the emergence of new variants, especially the immune-escape variants, capable of escaping immunity wholly or partially induced by prior infection or vaccination [9]. In fact, a noteworthy hypothesis being advanced asserts that such variants may arise through de novo mutation and selection in partially immune hosts due to the weak immune response following infection or vaccination. This conjecture is being challenged as the transmission of SARS-CoV-2 virus typically takes place in the early stage of infection following relatively few cycles of replication [10]. Further, there may not be adequate prospects for adaptive mutants to be generated in a frequency that may lead to onward transmission, and the intermediate levels of immunity may also suf iciently restrict viral replication and thus limit adaptive mutations [11].
It has been observed that those infected with high viral load generally have one or few within-host variants. In other words, in most of SARS-CoV-2 infection, there is low levels of within-host diversity when viral loads are high. Further, the major variant is typically transmitted from the host, whereas the minor variants lost. Only sporadically, the minor variant is transmitted, or multiple variants are transmitted, leading to a mixed infection from SARS-CoV-2 variants. The virulent variant is indicated by severity of the disease as well as the ensuing mortality rate, it can cause. In general, if the virus becomes more transmissible, its lethality may drop. But in this respect, the D614G variant having increased transmissibility, spread globally during the irst year of the pandemic with no obvious drop in its virulence. Further, the current VOCs, B.1.1.7 lineage has an estimated transmission advantage of ~50% and B.1.617.2 more transmissible than the former, manifest a higher virulence than the ancestral lineages. In addition, they are presumed to have acquired a decreased sensitivity to natural and/or vaccine-acquired immunity similar to the B.1.351 and P.1 variants, underlining the fact that the evolving SARS-CoV-2 may behave in a complex way with new mutations or combinations of mutations conferring selective advantages to the virus.

Vi ral phylogenics and epidemiological dynamics:
Through identifying SNPs, the viral phylogenics can be used to evaluate viral emergence, characterize the geographical spread, reconstruct epidemiological dynamics, and identify instances of adaptation. As estimated, the SARS-CoV-2 virus evolves at a rate of ∼1.1 × 10 −3 substitutions per site per year, which corresponds to one substitution every ∼11 days, and has the most recent common ancestor (TMRCA) around late November 2019 [12]. The phylodynamic analyses can also give information about the virus spread, both spatially and temporally, and allow to identify the viruses circulating in a region as well as new virus introductions. In addition, the phylodynamic techniques may indicate the rate of viral spread through a host population and identify occurrence of viral adaptations. The number of available SARS-CoV-2 genomic sequences is enormous. These are often reported without exact sampling location data because of certain privacy issues. However, viral dynamics may be heterogeneous even within and between geographically close locations. Furthermore, the travel related issues complicate the phylodynamic data. Despite these challenges, a huge reliable SARS-CoV-2 sequence data is available on GISAID's EpiCov database and on other platforms such as Nextstrain and Microreact. Because of their potential phenotypic effects, evolution of genomic insertions, deletions, and recombinants are of paramount signi icance and need to be monitored.
The viruses evolve as a result of mutations and natural selection for favourable traits such as more ef icient viral replication, transmission, and evasion of host defences. In general, the viral adaptations take place through the evolution of novel viral traits such as immune escape through genetic variation. The latter occurs through nucleotide substitutions, misincorporations, insertions or deletions. Apart from this, the recombinations are common in CoVs during replication and give rise to new SARS-CoV-2 lineages. But the diversity of SARS-CoV-2 is limited because of proofreading function of the 3′-5′ exonuclease nsp14. Thus, the vaccines based on a single sequence of the viral S protein are likely to generate an immune response protective to various circulating variants. However, the newer variants of SARS-CoV-2 with mutations in S protein have emerged, posing potential challenges for vaccination and antibody-based therapies. The continuing pandemic and unprecedented spread of SARS-CoV-2 may lead to the possibility for accumulation of additional consequential mutations in S protein and throughout the viral genome [13].

Intra-host diversity and onward transmission:
The SARS-CoV-2 shares high sequence homology with SARS-CoV both in genomic structure and host receptor preference. Whereas SARS-CoV-2 and the common cold human coronavirus, HCoV-NL63, though both recognize ACE2 as the host cell receptor, have major sequence and structural differences in the receptor-binding domain (RBD) of S protein. This diversity indicates that CoVs can potentially tolerate changes in both sequence and structure without substantial loss of function. The S protein has two subunits, S1 which contains an amino (N)-terminal domain (NTD) and receptorbinding domain (RBD), and the subunit S2 which mediates virus-host cell fusion. The antibody-neutralizing epitopes are scattered throughout S protein but are mostly concentrated in the RBD. As such, the evolution potential of SARS-CoV-2 is limited because of proofreading function of nsp14. The understanding about the individual phenotypic effects of the S1 mutations is emerging, and it has been noted that substitutions and deletions in S1 can affect transmissibility (Tr), vaccine ef icacy (Ef), and virulence (Vi). The irst notable evolutionary event was the D614G (Asp 614 →Gly) substitution, which increased the ACE2 af inity, leading to higher infectivity and transmissibility of the G variant.
Further, the substitution at position Asn 501 with Thr or Phe increases af inity for ACE2 binding [14]. The substitution at position 452, a leucine-to-arginine substitution (L452R), confers higher af inity of the S protein for the ACE2 receptor and decreased recognition by immune system. Whereas the substitution at position 681, a proline-to-arginine substitution (P681R), facilitates cleavage of the S precursor protein to the active S1/S2 con iguration and, thus, boosts cell-level infectivity. The variants may have reduced sensitivity to neutralizing antibodies that bind to the RBD because of triple substitutions of key amino acids, Lys417, Glu484, and Asn501, in the RBD at the ACE2-binding interface or the NTD. It is possible that there is a convergent association of mutations. The mutations that reduce neutralizing antibody binding, such as E484K, may require compensatory mutations that restore infectivity, such as N501Y, as is the case in the B.1.351 and P.1 lineages. Similar situation occurs in B.1.1.7 [K] or Alpha [K] lineage, where E484K is present with N501Y. The role of compensatory mutations is also supported by the emerging B.1.525 lineage that has both E484K and Δ69-70 leading to reduced antibody sensitivity and compensatory increase in infectivity, respectively.
The diversity of SARS-CoV-2 is limited because of proofreading function of the 3′-5′ exonuclease nsp14. Albeit, the proofreading capacity of nsp14 is limited to point mutations and it cannot repair other greater alterations such as deletion, insertion, recombination or misincorporation. Thus, Signi icant intra-host evolution of SARS-CoV-2 can occur as reported various case studies in some patients with protracted infection due to impaired immunity [15,16]. These patients had up to ivefold reduced neutralization sensitivity to convalescent plasma (CP) and/or monoclonal antibody therapy, in addition to shedding high titers of SARS-CoV-2 and having active SARS-CoV-2 infection for an average of 115 days before clearing the infection or succumbing to COVID-19 [17,18]. These case studies in immunocompromised patients have documented the deletions of amino acids 69 to 70 (Δ69-70), Δ141-144, or Δ242-248 in S1; the N501T (Asn 501 →Thr) or N501Y (Asn 501 →Tyr) mutations; and the E484K (Glu 484 →Lys) and Q493K (Gln 493 →Lys) mutations in the RBD. There have been found various deletions in the amino (N)-terminal domain (NTD) of S1 in B.1.1.7 and B.1.351. In addition, other mutations in these variants include K417N, E484K, and N501Y. It is noteworthy that these reports preceded the detection of three major circulating variants-B.1.1.7, B.1.351, and P.1, which contain at least eight single, nonsynonymous nucleotide changes, including E484K, N501Y, and/or K417N (Lys 417 →Asn) in the RBD [19]. Occasionally, SARS-CoV-2 virus can evolve into multiple distinct lineages within the same infected individual [20].
The complex process of immune response: Several studies suggest that the major circulating variants, such as B.1.351, P.1, and B.1.1.7 lineages, and probably B.1.617.2 lineage have reduced neutralizing sensitivity to convalescent plasma and plasma from recently vaccinated individuals [21,22]. Though, the reduced antibody sensitivity against these variants do not invariably prove that a vaccine is not effective, still the recent data suggests that certain vaccines may be especially less protective against the B.1.351 variant [23]. Further, there is growing concern for the emergence of immune escape mutants in a protracted SARS-CoV-2 infection. Similarly, the partial roll-out and incomplete immunization of individuals leading to suboptimal titers of neutralizing antibody could also promote evolution of escape variants. On the other hand, halting the spread of SARS-CoV-2 through a coordinated and comprehensive vaccination programme and prevention strategies like masking and social distancing are likely to prevent the evolution of immune escape variants.
The immune response following SARS-CoV-2 infection or COVID-19 vaccination is a complex process (Figure 3 [24]. In short, a VOC is a SARS-CoV-2 variant with demonstrable increase in transmissibility, increase in virulence or a signi icant change in clinical presentation, or decrease in effectiveness of public health measures or available diagnostics, vaccines, therapeutics. Whereas a VOI is a SARS-CoV-2 variant with genomic changes affecting transmissibility, disease severity, immune escape, diagnostic or therapeutic escape, and ability to enhance community transmission resulting in multiple COVID-19 clusters at multiple geographical locations with increasing number of cases or having other epidemiological impacts to leading to an emerging risk to global public health. with altered spike, has emerged and is responsible for Uganda epidemic [25].
It is likely that the VOIs and VOCs are the result of selective  it appears to confer a competitive advantage for the SARS-CoV-2 variants by increasing the af inity of spike for ACE2 and together with other less well characterized mutations has resulted in enhanced infectivity.
The Delta (B.1.617.2) genome has 13 mutations, 15 or 17 according to some other sources. The three of them, L452R, T478K, P681R, present the spike protein are of particular concern. The Delta Plus variant is supposed to be formed due to a mutation called K417N in the Delta or B.1.617.2 variant. There is exchange at position 417 (lysine-to-asparagine substitution) in Delta plus variant. The K417N mutation in S protein is associated with immune escape and reduced susceptibility to vaccine, and mAbs therapy. Globally, more than 12 countries have detected Delta Plus cases.

Imperfect humoral, T-cell, and interferon response:
The infection with seasonal and cross-reacting CoVs is common in humans. In general, the CoVs do not provoke a fully protective immunity, and repeat infections are common. The studies show that detectable antibody levels wane over the irst few months, post-infection [27]. This is exempli ied by the ineffective serum antibody levels against the seasonal human coronavirus OC43 -HCoV-OC43 [28]. Similarly, the vaccines tend to be non-ef icient at preventing seasonal CoV infection [29]. But the HCoV-speci ic immunity may wane but is not lost. In fact, they are less ef icient than natural infections at provoking immunity and carry risks of adverse cross-reactions. As related to the SARS-CoV-1 infection, the humoral immunity may last up to 2 to 3 years, but antigenspeci ic T cells against the virus have been detected 11 years after infection [30].
The nature of the immune response after natural SARS-CoV-2 infection is complex and diverse. There are intricacies in COVID-19 dynamics and immunological characterization to SARS-CoV-2 infections. There is evidence of pre-existing T cells and antibodies capable of cross-reacting with SARS-CoV-2 suggests that immunological memory responses elicited during infection with seasonal coronaviruses may also affect COVID-19 susceptibility and disease risk as well as clinical manifestations. In this context, it has been hypothesized that severe COVID-19 manifestations may arise due to presence of non-neutralizing antibodies from prior CoV infections [31]. Further, the T cell-mediated response is likely to play an important role in regulating the SARS-CoV-2 viral replication and disease manifestations.
There are variations in the immune response to a primary SARS-CoV-2 infection. The individual factors like earlier exposure to a CoV infection as well as the genetic factors may lead to different immune landscapes and affect clinical manifestations and severity of the disease. Considering the common four circulating HCoVs in children and adults which cause common cold and that the primary infections usually occurs early in life, the reinfection with a CoV later may cause a recall response. The pre-existing non-neutralizing antibodies from prior CoV infections as well as the T-cellmediated response dependent on tenacity and recall of immune memory in a population group, thus, may affect the course of the pandemic ranging from recurring outbreaks and resurgence to its near-elimination.
Loss of neutralizing epitopes in the S protein in the SARS-CoV-2 variants is likely to reduce the immune response [32]. In this context, the T cell mediated response may feature as a superior correlate of protection (CoP) against COVID-19 as the new more infectious and virulent variants emerge. The CD4+ and CD8+ T cell response encompasses speci icity to several hundred epitopes across the entire SARS-CoV-2 proteome, the majority of which are unpaired in the virus. The T cell epitopes that are altered in the SARS-CoV-2 variants are likely to bind to the various human leukocyte antigen (HLA) molecules presenting antigenic peptides to T cells, even when binding af inities are altered. Thus, the variants, such as Alpha variant, disabling the irst line of immune defense, get more time to multiply, and may overcome the T cell mediated response.
There exists another line of anti-viral defence, represented by production and secretion of interferon by the host cells. But like many other viruses, SARS-CoV-2 has evolved mechanisms to reduce its exposure to IFN-I [33]. Its Alpha variant drives down the production of interferon by infected lung cells by looding with Orf9b proteins. Whereas the Beta and Delta variants drive down interferon production in the infected cells through a different mechanism. The nsp13, nsp14, nsp15, and orf6, orf8, and the M protein are potent inhibitors of the MAVS pathway, leading to inhibition of IFNβ production. The severe COVID-19 is associated with exhaustion of CD4+ and CD8+ T cells, as a result of de icient IFN-I production. Further, the IFN-I production, is signi icantly impaired in obesity and metabolic syndrome, and with ageing.
The erratic and overactive immune re actions: The innate immunity is the irst line of defence against the SARS-CoV-2 virus invasion. The recognition of pathogen results in subsequent cytolytic immune responses, mainly through the type I interferons (IFN) and natural killer cells. The adaptive immunity also plays an important part in viral clearance via activated cytotoxic T cells that destroy virusinfected cells and the antibody-producing B cells target virus-speci ic antigens. The anti-viral immune response is crucial to eliminate the invading virus, but an overactive and persistent anti-viral immune response may lead to massive production of in lammatory cytokines and damage the host tissues. One of the major causes of ARDS in COVID-19 patients is a hyperactive immune system. The overproduction of cytokines caused by aberrant immune activation is known as a cytokine storm. The alveolar macrophages expressing ACE2 are a prime target cells for SARS-CoV-2 infection and these activated macrophages may play an important role in the hyperin lammatory syndrome due an overactive Immune response [34].
There is a complex immune landscape generated by SARS-CoV-2 infection [35]. The issue of immunity with SARS-CoV-2 infection is complex and COVID-19 as a disease weakens the immune system as well as leads it to act in erratic manner leading to the cytokine storm in certain cases. The immune ef icacy with respect to susceptibility does not appear to prevent reinfection, but may attenuate the severity, possibly retard reinfection and may or may not reduce transmissibility or infectiousness. There is possibility that symptoms due to a CoV reinfection may be mild, and the virus may be cleared more quickly. The rapid rise in both IgM and IgG following a CoV infection, indicates that earlier primary infection with a common endemic HCoV strain provokes a recall response and the resurged HCoV-speci ic immunity may in luence the course of COVID-19 illness.
The viral variant and other pathogen characteristics also have impact on the course of COVID-19 infection and disease. Patients with severe disease have substantially lower lymphocyte counts with reduced number of CD4+ T cells, CD8+ T cells, and natural killer cells. Whereas the proin lammatory subsets of T cells, including IL-17-producing CCR4+ CCR6+ CD4+ (T-helper 17 or Th17) cells and perforin and granulysin-expressing cytotoxic T cells are increased. It has been indicated that the particular helper T cell population, tissue-resident memory-like Th17 cells (Trm17), in the lungs of patients with severe COVID-19 may be central to the development of hyperin lammation, lung injury, and subsequent ARDS. In addition, there are present high plasma concentrations of in lammatory cytokines such as IL-6 and tumor necrosis factor (TNF). The Trm17 cells may become activated as part of a cytokine storm, during which they start producing in lammatory molecules like GM-CSF [36].

Immune response to COVID-19 vaccines:
The present vaccines available for COVID-19 prophylaxis are based on the wild-type viral S protein. Most vaccinated people develop neutralizing antibody (Ab) with an IC50 (half maximal inhibitory concentration) within the protective margin, although precise correlates of protection (CoP) are unknown. Variants with E484K mutations and other escape mutants may bring down vaccine ef icacy, prompting the need for new and updated vaccines [38]. Further, there is a complex immune landscape generated by vaccination program in face of prevalence of various SARS-CoV-2 variants as the population groups may comprise of non-exposed, exposed, and noninfected, and exposed and infected persons with history of asymptomatic or mild disease and those with moderate to severe disease. Further, the individual immune response and the cumulative immune landscape of the population are important for SARS-CoV-2 primary and secondary infection and vaccination and determine the prospect for the pandemic.
As the pandemic is evolving and spreading to newer geographical regions, various genetic, racial, geographical, and socioeconomical factors are bound to in luence the course of the pandemic. Various analyses consider that the severity of infection with SARS-CoV-2 may change in due course over a span of years in future. The epidemiological and immunological data indicate that the infection-blocking immunity for the virus wanes rapidly, but that diseasereducing immunity is long-lived [39]. Further, there is likely to be transition from epidemic to endemic dynamics associated with a shift in the age distribution of primary infections to younger age groups. Here, an optimistic model envisages that once the endemic phase is reached and primary exposure is in childhood, the virulence of SARS-CoV-2 may go down. Further, depending on its immune response, a vaccine could accelerate the state of mild disease endemicity by cultivating herd immunity. However, there might be a different outcome for the emergent infection causing a severe disease in children. Both situations reinforce the importance of vaccination and behavioral practices for disease containment.
There is question of the functional immunity to reinfection, disease, and carrier state with viral shedding and the endemicity of SARS-CoV-2 in the long run. The longitudinal analysis of SARS patients provides an opportunity to measure the durability of immune memory in the absence of reexposure. In contrast to the antibodies, the memory T cells persist for much longer periods in animal models, and the immunity induced by previous strains is potent to prevent severe disease. However, the effect of genomic variation may in luence the vaccine-induced immunity in light of the narrow epitope repertoire of currently available vaccines. On the other hand, the immune evasion is supposed to come at a biological itness cost to the virus and impose an upper limit to the number of probable mutations when faced with the neutralizing antibody repertoire [40]. The similar mutations arising recurrently in the spike through convergent evolution in geographically distinct isolates also indicate that the spike variants offering a survival advantage to the virus are limited.
It appears that frequent and regular boosting of immunity by repeat doses of the COVID-19 vaccine may be required to maintain protection from the virus especially in light of temporary and waning immunity. Apparently, mimicking the natural immunity by vaccination may be a practical prophylactic strategy. Thus, during the transition of pandemic to endemicity, the SARS-CoV-2 infections may frequently occur in older individuals, and the immunity induced by infection or vaccination similar to that produced by natural infections in childhood may be a desirable outcome. Further, if the vaccine is able to cause a major reduction in transmission, in long run it may be suitable to consider strategies to vaccinate the older individuals for whom infection can cause a severe morbidity and higher mortality, while allowing natural immunity and transmission to be maintained in younger individuals.

Current scenario and prospects
Unrestrained pandemic and future scenario: Using symptoms as a surveillance tool to curb the spread of SARS-CoV-2 is dif icult, as milder reinfections increasingly contribute to ongoing transmissions [41]. Further, the infection or vaccination may protect against disease but may not provide transmission-blocking immunity needed for achieving signi icant long-term herd immunity. Furthermore, social distancing, masking, and an effective vaccination are critical for control of the pandemic and during its transition to endemicity. Once the endemic phase is reached and primary cases during childhood may manifest as mild disease, mass vaccination may no longer be necessary. But, if the primary infections in children are severe, then vaccination during childhood will need to be continued. Further, in light of the possible changes in the disease severity due to evolving variants and changing immunity landscape, we need to plan carefully for the transition to endemicity and the ongoing circulation of the virus.
Presently, the SARS-CoV-2 infection is so widespread with multiple evolving infectious variants that the hope of its elimination is bleak. However, there can be envisaged a possible outcome that the acquired immunity from infection, reinfection and vaccination may lead to its endemicity [32]. As such, the future trajectory of the disease may be dif icult to predict in a set of non-cohesive population comprising of various age groups, harbouring different risk factors, and having varied background in matter of exposure to the infection, manifestation of the disease, and inadequate immunization [42]. Further, though within-host emergence of escape mutants seems to be uncommon during early infection when viral loads are high, occurrence of immune-escape variants in high-viral-load samples emphasizes caution and need for continued vigilance [43].

The watchful and optimistic approach:
The laboratory studies test the vaccine ef icacy with a focus on level of the antibodies and their ability to block the virus from infecting cells, the immune response to the infecting virus is complex. In the human body the antibodies are a part of the immune response supplemented by the immune T cells, which help in curtailing the infection by identifying and eliminating the infected cells and help to protect from evolving a mild illness to severe disease [44]. Several COVID-19 vaccines appear to work against the VOCs and VOIs, as well. The earlier reports suggested that the vaccines might not work against of the variants, such as the Beta (B.1.351) variant, but the realworld data out of Qatar suggests that the P izer vaccine works satisfactorily well against it [45].
The immune response against the COVID-19 vaccine, in general, is robust. The full vaccination seems to offer 75% protection against B.1.351 infections, less than the 95% ef icacy reported in the trials but still to a signi icant level. Simultaneously, there is evidence from clinical studies that the T-cell response may provide signi icant protection against emerging SARS-CoV-2 variants, as well [46]. There is evidence that when the vaccinated people get infected, are protected from the severe disease and serious outcomes [47]. Compared to this, the role of the vaccine in protecting Long Covid manifestations is being assumed, though not backed by large clinical studies [48].

Upgradation of the COVID-19 vaccines:
On entering host cells, the SARS-CoV-2 virus starts replicating. With replication, the chances of random errors, or mutations, crop up during the viral replication cycle, despite the proofreading function of the nsp14 protein. Most of these errors are inconsequential, only a few being of epidemiological concern. Various mutations or their particular combinations, which improve the survival SARS-CoV-2 virus are emerging in different world regions, a phenomenon known as convergent evolution [49]. These particular combinations of mutations are seen to occur over and over again. The irst major variant with spike-protein mutation, D614G has helped transmission of SARS-CoV-2 world over. Later, the Alpha (B.1.1.7) variant, has fast replaced those less infectious. The mutation, E484K helps the virus to evade the immune response. In due course, the variants carrying advantageous mutations outcompete a variant that is lacking them and replace it [50].
In fact, the phenomenon of convergent evolution may be a hopeful sign, as the virus may run out of ways to adapt to its habitat. In fact, the convergent evolution may be seen as the game of Tetris, where a limited number of building blocks can be assembled in different but limited combinations [51]. Thus, controlling infections, may hopefully limit the number of evolving variants, and vice versa. There is another aspect of phenomenon of convergent evolution. Faced with new variants, the current vaccines will eventually but gradually become less effective. But, as the virus has a limited number of viable mutations, the vaccines may be updated time to time based on the immunodynamics of evolving SARS-CoV-2