Research Article

Left Atrial Remodeling is Associated with Left Ventricular Remodeling in Patients with Reperfused Acute Myocardial Infarction

Christodoulos E Papadopoulos*, Dimitrios G Zioutas, Panagiotis Charalambidis, Aristi Boulbou, Konstantinos Triantafyllou, Konstantinos Baltoumas, Haralambos I. Karvounis and Vassilios Vassilikos

Published: 12/07/2016 | Volume 1 - Issue 1 | Pages: 001-008


Background: Left atrial volume (LAV) has been established as a sensitive marker of left ventricular (LV) diastolic function and as an independent predictor of mortality in patients with acute myocardial infarction (AMI). LA remodeling and its determinants in the setting of AMI have not been much studied.

Methods: We studied 53 patients with anterior AMI and a relatively preserved LV systolic function, who underwent complete reperfusion and received guidelines guided antiremodeling drug management. LA and LV remodeling were assessed using 2D echocardiography at baseline and 6 months. LAV indexed for BSA (LAVi) was used as the index of LA size and further LA remodeling.

Results: LAVi increased signifi cantly at 6 months compared to baseline [28.1 (23.0-34.5) vs 24.4 (19.5- 31.6) ml/m2, p=0.002] following LV end diastolic-volume index change [56.8 (47.6-63.9) vs 49.5 (42.0-58.4) ml/m2, p=0.0003]. Other standard LV diastolic function indices did not show any signifi cant change. Univariateanalysis showed a strong positive correlation of LAVi change with BNP levels at discharge, LV mass index and LV volumes indices change, throughout the follow up period. Multivariate regression analysis revealed that BNP plasma levels was the most important independent predictor of LA remodeling (b-coef.=0.630, p=0.001).

Conclusions: Despite current antiremodeling strategies in patients with AMI, LA remodeling is frequently asssociated with LV remodeling. Additionally LAVi change in the mid-term reflects better than standard echocardiographic indices LV diastolic filling impairment.

Read Full Article HTML DOI: 10.29328/journal.jccm.1001001 Cite this Article


  1. Tsang TS, Abhayaratna WP, Barnes ME, Miyasaka Y, Gersh BJ, et al. Prediction of cardiovascular outcomes with left atrial size. Is volume superior to area or diameter? J Am Coll Cardiol. 2006; 47: 1018-1023. Ref.:
  2. Moller JE, Hillis GS, Oh JK, Seward JB, Reeder GS, et al. Left atrial volume: A powerful predictor of survival after acute myocardial infarction. Circulation. 2003; 107: 2207-2212. Ref.:
  3. Beinart R, Boyko V, Schwammenthal E, Kuperstein R, Sagie A, et al. Long-term prognostic signifi cance of left atrial volume in acute myocardial infarction. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2004; 44: 327-334 Ref.:
  4. Meris A, Amigoni M, Uno H, Thune JJ, Verma A, et al. Left atrial remodeling in patients with myocardial infarction complicated by heart failure, left ventricular dysfunction, or both: the VALIANT Echo Substudy. Eur Heart J. 2009; 30: 56-65. Ref.:
  5. Rossi A, Cicoira M, Zanolla L, Sandrini R, Golia G, et al. Determinants and prognostic value of left atrial volume in patients with dilated cardiomyopathy. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2002; 40: 1425-1430. Ref.:
  6. Cabin HS, Clubb KS, Hall C, Perlmutter RA, Feinstein AR. Risk for systemic embolization of atrial fi brillation without mitral stenosis. Am J Cardiol. 1990; 65: 1112-1116. Ref.:
  7. Reed D, Abbott RD, Smucker ML, Kaul S. Prediction of outcome after mitral valve replacement in patients with symptomatic chronic mitral regurgitation. The importance of left atrial size. Circulation. 1991; 84: 23-34. Ref.:
  8. Barnes ME, Miyasaka Y, Seward JB, Gersh BJ, Rosales AG, et al. Left atrial volume in the prediction of fi rst ischemic stroke in an elderly cohort without atrial fi brillation. Mayo Clin Proc. 2004; 79: 1008-1014. Ref.:
  9. Gottdiener JS, Kitzman DW, Aurigemma GP, Arnold AM, Manolio TA. Left atrial volume, geometry, and function in systolic and diastolic heart failure of persons >65 years of age (the Cardiovascular Health Study). Am J Cardiol. 2006; 97: 83-89. Ref.:
  10. Nagueh SF, Appleton CP, Gillebert TC, Marino PN, Oh JK, et al. Recommendations for the evaluation of left ventricular diastolic function by echocardiography. J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 2009; 22: 107-133. Ref.:
  11. Popescu BA, Macor F, Antonini-Canterin F, Giannuzzi P, Temporelli PL, et al. Left atrial remodelling after acute myocardial infarction (results of the GISSI-3 Echo substudy). Am J Cardiol. 2004; 93: 1156-1159. Ref.:
  12. Kushner FG, Hand M, Smith SC Jr, King SB III, Anderson JL, et al. 2009 focused update of the ACC/AHA guidelines for the management of patients with ST-Elevation myocardial infarction (updating the 2004 guideline and 2007 focused update) and the ACC/AHA/SCAI guidelines on percutaneous coronary intervention (updating the 2005 guideline and 2007 focused update): a report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2009; 54: 2205-2241. Ref.:
  13. Schiller NB, Shah PM, Crawford M, De Maria A, Devereux R, et al. American Society of Echocardiography Committee on Standards on Quantitation of Two-Dimensional Echocardiograms: recommendations for quantitation of the left ventricle by two-dimensional echocardiography. J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 1989; 2: 358-367. Ref.:
  14. Lang RM, Bierig M, Devereux RB, Flachskampf FA, Foster E, et al. American Society of Echocardiography’s Nomenclature and Standards Committee; Task Force on Chamber Quantifi cation; American College of Cardiology Echocardiography Committee; American Heart Association; European Association of Echocardiography, European Society of Cardiology recommendations for chamber quantifi cation. Eur J Echocardiogr. 2006; 7: 79-108. Ref.:
  15. Jilaihawi H, Greaves S, Rouleau JL, Pfeffer MA, Solomon SD. for the Healing and Early Afterload 47. Reducing Therapy (HEART) Trial Investigators. Am J Cardiol. 2003; 91: 723-726. Ref.:
  16. Temporelli PL, Giannuzzi P, Nicolosi GL, Latini R, Franzosi MG, et al. Doppler-derived mitral deceleration time as a strong prognostic marker of left ventricular remodeling and survival after acute myocardial infarction. Results of the GISSI-3 echo substudy. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2004; 43: 1646-1653. Ref.:
  17. Appleton CP, Jensen JL, Hatle LK, Oh JK. Doppler evaluation of left and right ventricular diastolic function: a technical guide for obtaining optimal fl ow velocity recordings. J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 1997; 10: 271-292. Ref.:
  18. Moller JE, Pellicka PA, Hillis GS, Oh JK. Prognostic importance of diastolic function and fi lling pressure in patients with acute myocardial infarction. Circulation. 2006; 114: 438-444. Ref.:
  19. Moller JE, Sondergaard E, Seward JB, Appleton CP, Egstrup K. Ratio of left ventricular peak E-wave velocity to fl ow propagation velocity assessed by color M-mode Doppler echocardiography in fi rst myocardial infarction. Prognostic and clinical implications. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2000; 35: 363-370. Ref.:
  20. Savoye C, Equine O, Tricot O, Nugue O, Segrestin B, et al. Myocardial infarction in modern clinical practice (from the REmodelage Ventriculaire [REVE] Study Group). Am J Cardiol. 2006; 98: 1144-1149. Ref.:
  21. Abhayaratna WP, Seward JB, Appleton CP, Douglas PS, Oh JK, et al. Left atrial size. Physiologic determinants and clinical applications. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2006; 47: 2357-2363. Ref.:
  22. Matsuda Y, Toma Y, Ogawa H, MatsuzakI M, Katayama K, et al. Importance of left atrial function in patients with myocardial infarction. Circulation. 1983; 67: 566-571. Ref.:
  23. Hillis GS, Ujino K, Mulvagh S, Hagen M, Oh K. Echocardiographic indices of increased left ventricular filling pressure and dilation after acute myocardial infarction. J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 2006; 19: 450-456. Ref.:
  24. Grilley JG, Farrer M. Left ventricular remodeling and brain natriuretic peptide after fi rst myocardial infarction. Heart. 2001; 86: 638-642. Ref.:
  25. Nilsson JC, Groenning BA, Nielsen G, Fritz-Hansen T, Trawinski J, et al. Left ventricular remodeling in the fi rst year after acute myocardial infarction and the predictive value of N-terminal pro brain natriuretic peptide. Am Heart J. 2002; 143: 696-702. Ref.:
  26. Papadopoulos CE, Karvounis HI, Giannakoulas G, Karamitsos TD, Efthimiadis GK, et al. Predictors of left ventricular remodeling after reperfused acute myocardial infarction. Am J Cardiol. 2007; 99: 1024-1025. Ref.:
  27. De Lemos JA, Morrow DA, Bentley JH, Omland T, Sabatine MS, et al. The prognostic value of B-type natriuretic peptide in patients with acute coronary syndromes. N Engl J Med. 2001; 345: 1014-1021. Ref.:
  28. Kruszewski K, Scott AE, Barclay JL, Small GR, Croal BL, et al. Noninvasive assessment of left ventricular filling pressure after acute myocardial infarction: A prospective study of the relative prognostic utility of clinical assessment, echocardiography, and B-type natriuretic peptide. Am Heart J. 2010; 159: 47-54. Ref.:
  29. Tripepi G, Mattace-Raso, Mallamaci F, Benedetto FA, Witteman J, et al. Biomarkers of left atrial volume. A longitudinal study in patients with end stage renal disease. Hypertension. 2009; 54: 818-824. Ref.:
  30. Kim H, Jun DW, Cho YK, Nam CW, Han SW, et al. The correlation of left atrial volume index to the level of N-terminal pro-BNP in heart failure with a preserved ejection fraction. Echocardiography. 2008; 5: 961-967. Ref.:
  31. Barclay JL, Kruszewski K, Croal BL, Cuthbertson BH, Oh JK, et al. Relation of left atrial volume to B-type natriuretic peptide levels in patients with stable chronic heart failure. Am J Cardiol. 2006; 98: 98-101. Ref.: