Archives of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences

Editorial

You Are Here:

Paediatric Medicines: Formulation Considerations

Fátima Roque*

Research Unit for Inland Development, Polytechnic of Guarda (Unidade de Investigação para o Desenvolvimento do Interior - UDI/IPG), 6300-559 Guarda, Portugal

*Address for Correspondence: Fátima Roque, Research Unit for Inland Development, Polytechnic of Guarda (Unidade de Investigação para o Desenvolvimento do Interior - UDI/IPG), 6300-559 Guarda, Portugal, Email: froque@ipg.pt

Dates: Submitted: 10 April 2017; Approved: 28 July 2017; Published: 31 July 2017

How to cite this article: Roque F. Paediatric Medicines: Formulation Considerations. Arch Pharm Pharma Sci. 2017; 1: 024-027.

Copyright: © 2017 Roque F. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

ABSTRACT

The use of unlicensed and off-label medicines in children is widespread and has raised an increasing concern over the last years. The majority of medicines taken by children are extemporaneously compounded by pharmacist, and there is a lack of information regarding bioavailability, suitability and stability. These formulations must be prepared from pure active substance and not from commercially available dosage forms. The development of paediatric formulations, particularly those suitable for very young children, can be a challenge to pharmacists. There is limited knowledge available about the acceptability of different dosage forms, administration volume, dosage form size, taste, safety of formulation excipients regarding to age and development status. The selection of formulation and route of administration depends on the disease being treated and the clinical condition. European Guidelines and reflection papers recommend that pharmaceutical development should consider some parameters like capability, acute or long-term illness, caregiver convenience, disability, culture differences and formulations more attractive to children must be explored.

EDITORIAL

A lack of medicines for children and the impact of paediatric Regulation after ten years of publication

Throughout many years there were no incentives for the investigation of paediatric medicines and the clinical trials during new drugs development included only adults leading to the lack of medicines well studied in children. In 2002 the European commission published the document “Better Medicines for children”, alerting for the needs of developing medicines adequate to paediatric population [1]. However, only in 2007 was published the Regulation (EC) No 1901/2006, whose main objective is lead to the development of new drugs for paediatric use, with the introduction of “Paediatric Investigation Plans” during the development of new drugs, and with incentives to study in children the authorized products for adults no longer covered by intellectual property rights through the Paediatric Use Marketing Authorization (PUMA) [2]. The main goal of this regulatory measures is to ensure the efficacy, safety and tolerability of medicines used in paediatrics and the availability of medicines studied in paediatric populations.

The 10-years Report from the Paediatric Committee and European Medicines agency about the application of the Paediatric Regulation shows a very positive impact on paediatric drug development, namely [3]: more medicines for children as well as more and better information for prescribers and patients, better paediatric research and development, more regulatory support for paediatric matters and the integration of paediatrics as integral part of medicines development. Comparing the number of centrally authorized medicines for children in 2004-2006 and 2012-2014, it was observed an increasing number of new paediatric products (from 19 to 30) and new paediatric indications (from 12 to 38). Moreover, the number of new medicines and new pharmaceutical forms adequate for children approved from 2007 until 2015 were 238 and 39 respectively [3].

However, the impact of the Paediatric regulation on the development of paediatric formulations with the off-patent medicinal products that have been used during years as unlicensed or off-label in the paediatric population was not so positive, being the first PUMA authorized in 2011 and the second in 2014 [3]. Maybe that explains why the governmental initiatives and these regulation implemented in Europe to encourage drug research in children have had a marginal impact on unlicensed and off-label drug use rates on inpatient and outpatient health care settings [4,5].

Use of unlicensed and off-label Extemporaneous preparations in paediatric population

Many medicines already available on the market for adults continue to be used on children without appropriate studies in paediatric population and the use of unlicensed and off-label medicines in children is still a reality [4-10].

In addition to the lack of knowledge of adequate dosages that may lead to serious adverse reactions, other problems arise associated with the use of adult dosage forms in children, namely: use of magistral and officinal preparations without information about stability, administration of excipients included in the drug adult formulation could be harmful to the paediatric population [2,5,11]. In general excipients are considered to be “inert”, however in children and particularly in neonates some of them have demonstrated some activity and are potentially toxic for this population with increasing reports of adverse reactions [12]. There are few studies that analyse that and discuss the excipients included in the different trade market and generic medicines available in the market with the same active substance. In a pilot study that analysed 790 adult medicines [13], it was observed that all of them contained one or more excipients listed on the Guideline Excipients in the label and package leaflet of medicinal products for human use [14]. When children take extemporaneous preparations there is a risk of exposure to harmful doses of these excipients leading to toxicity.

Although there is lack of studies on the quality and stability of extemporaneous preparations, some authors have developed stability studies with simple formulations for some drugs frequently administered off-label and unlicensed, such as sildenafil [15,16], metformin [17], clonidine [18], propafenone [19]. Moreover the bioavailability of extemporaneous preparations is not studied, however it is well known that the bioavailability of the drug is modified when a dosage form is extemporaneously compounded [11,20].

The challenge of developing adequate formulations for children

The development of age-appropriate and acceptable paediatric dosage forms is a complex and challenging process, as it is necessary to have in consideration children´s acceptability and preferences for different formulations and to understand the physical and biochemistry differences between children and adults [21]. Acceptability of medicines in children and caregivers have an important impact on therapeutic adherence and consequently on the safety and efficacy [22,23]. The acceptability depends on the end-user and on the pharmaceutical characteristics, the first one is not a modifiable factor but the second one is. Some of these characteristics that could influence the acceptability of a medicine and that should be a critical point during the design of a new dosage form are: palatability and swallowability (e.g. size, shape, texture), appearance (e.g. color, shape, embossing), complexity of administration, the required dose (e.g. volume, number of tablets or capsules), dosing frequency and duration of treatment, the administration device, the containers closure system, the mode of administration and any related pain or discomfort [23].

Design of oral dosage forms for children should consider differences from adults like swallowing abilities, taste preferences and dosage requirements [24]. For years, liquid formulations were preferred for children as they allow to adjust doses across age groups. However, new oral formulations have been considered and recommended for children, namely orodispersible tablets and tablets used to prepare oral liquid preparations suitable for younger children, granules, multi-particle dosage forms, mini-tablets and pellets [24,25]. Examples of innovative oral dosage forms are oral lyophilisates, orally disintegrating mini-tablets, orally disintegrating films and more recently was developed a “pill swallowing cup” (the appropriate dose of drug is inside of the cup, which is filled with a liquid and then the patient drinks it) [24].

In addition, another critical point during the development of paediatric formulations is the selection of the excipients to be included, once excipients are often not “inert” from a biopharmaceutical perspective [24]. In this way, and following the Guideline on pharmaceutical development of medicines for paediatric use [23]when selecting an appropriate excipient for inclusion in a paediatric medicinal product some aspects should be considered: (i) the function of the excipient in the formulation and potential alternatives, (ii) the safety profile of the excipients for children in the target age group(s) on the basis of single and daily exposure, (iii) the expected duration of the treatment, (iv) the severity of the condition to be treated, (v) the patient acceptability including palatability and, (vi) allergies and sensitization.

As mentioned above, acceptability depends also on the characteristics of the end-user and some parameters like capability, acute or long-term illness, caregiver convenience, disabilities and cultural differences. Therefore, formulations that are more attractive to targeted children must be explored.

FINAL REMARKS

It is well known that the paediatric use of off-label and unlicensed medicines are a reality and that there is a lack of medicines well studied for children. Although there are already some studies focusing on the perceptions of children [26-28], it is still important to improve our knowledge in this area. It is fundamental to develop research in order to understand attitudes and preferences of children and their caregivers with the aim of developing dosage forms and formulations which are children-friendly.

REFERENCES

  1. European Comission. Better Medicines for children. Proposed regulatory actions on paediatric medicinal products. 2002.
  2. European Parliament and Council of European Union. Regulation (EC) No. 1901/2006 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 12 December 2006 on Medicinal Products for Paediatric Use. Official Journal of the European Union. 2006.
  3. European Medicines Agency and Paediatric Committee. 10-year Report to the European Commission General report on the experience acquired as a result of the application of the Paediatric Regulation”. 2016.
  4. Corny J, Lebel D, Bailey B, Bussieres JF. Unlicensed and Off-Label Drug Use in Children Before and After Pediatric Governmental Initiatives. J Pediatr Pharmacol Ther. 2015; 20: 316-328. Ref.: https://goo.gl/U6Rfrt
  5. Magalhaes J, Rodrigues AT, Roque F, Figueiras A, Falcao A, et al. Use of off-label and unlicenced drugs in hospitalised paediatric patients: a systematic review. Eur J Clin Pharmacol. 2015; 71: 1-13. Ref.: https://goo.gl/h9SJ3G
  6. Sohn M, Moga DC, Blumenschein K, Talbert J. National trends in off-label use of atypical antipsychotics in children and adolescents in the United States. Medicine (Baltimore). 2016; 95: e3784. Ref.: https://goo.gl/JKpDE6
  7. Sonninen K, Jyrkka J, Martikainen JE, Malmstrom K, Makela MJ, et al. Age-related off-label use of nasal corticosteroids for allergies is relatively common in Finnish children with asthma. Acta Paediatr. 2017. Ref.: https://goo.gl/pVRHDS
  8. Lai LL, Koh L, Ho JA, Ting A, Obi A. Off-Label Prescribing for Children with Migraines in U.S. Ambulatory Care Settings. J Manag Care Spec Pharm. 2017; 23: 382-338. Ref.: https://goo.gl/JCkAtt
  9. Schröder C, Dörks M, Kollhorst B, Blenk T, Dittmann RW, et al. Outpatient antidepressant drug use in children and adolescents in Germany between 2004 and 2011. Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf. 2017; 26: 170-179. Ref.: https://goo.gl/GkvNFD
  10. Schröder C, Dörks M, Kollhorst B, Blenk T, Dittmann RW, et al. Outpatient antipsychotic drug use in children and adolescents in Germany between 2004 and 2011. Eur Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 2017; 26: 413-420. Ref.: https://goo.gl/bRHxfC
  11. Nahata MC, Allen LV. Extemporaneous drug formulations. Clin Ther. 2008; 30: 2112-2119. Ref.: https://goo.gl/rfYfoq
  12. Fabiano V, Mameli C, Zuccotti GV. Paediatric pharmacology: remember the excipients. Pharmacol Res. 2011; 63: 362-365. Ref.: https://goo.gl/JGUhbK
  13. Nogueira F, Carvalho A, Tavares L, Ribeiro MP, Coutinho P, et al. Generic Drugs and Brand Name Products: an approach about excipients. Rev Saúde Pública. 2014; 48: 102. Ref.: https://goo.gl/uz2hKt  
  14. European Comission, Guideline Excipients in the label and package leaflet of medicinal products for human use. 2003.
  15. Roque F, Rama AC, Sousa JJ, Pina ME. Development and stability assessment of liquid paediatric formulations containing sildenafil citrate. Brazilian J Pharm Sci. 2013; 49: 381-388. Ref.: https://goo.gl/m7DdGM
  16. Provenza N, Calpena AC, Mallandrich M, Halbaut L, Clares B. Design and physicochemical stability studies of paediatric oral formulations of sildenafil. Int J Pharm. 2014; 460: 234-239. Ref.: https://goo.gl/9kbyHg  
  17. Alemón-Medina R, Chávez-Pacheco JL, Rivera-Espinosa L, Ramírez-Mendiola B, García-Álvarez R, et al. Extemporaneous Formulations of Metformin for Pediatric Endocrinology: Physicochemical Integrity, Cytotoxicity of Sweeteners, and Quantitation of Plasma Levels. Clin Ther. 2015;37: 1689-1702. Ref.: https://goo.gl/xvTvCe
  18. de Goede AL, Boedhram RR, Eckhardt M, Hanff LM, Koch BC, et al. Development and validation of a paediatric oral formulation of clonidine hydrochloride. Int J Pharm.2012; 433: 119-120. Ref.: https://goo.gl/pAvWUZ
  19. Juarez Olguin H, Flores Perez C, Ramirez Mendiola B, Coria Jimenez R, Sandoval Ramirez E, et al. Extemporaneous suspension of propafenone: attending lack of pediatric formulations in Mexico. Pediatr Cardiol. 2008;29: 1077-1081. Ref.: https://goo.gl/6ee3YD
  20. Sunkara G, Bende G, Mendonza AE, Solar-Yohay S, Biswal S, et al. Bioavailability of valsartan oral dosage forms. Clin Pharmacol Drug Dev. 2014; 3: 132-138. Ref.: https://goo.gl/96tiJF
  21. Batchelor HK, Marriott JF. Formulations for children: problems and solutions. Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2015; 79: 405-418. Ref.: https://goo.gl/Vy9trj  
  22. Liu F, Ranmal S, Batchelor HK, Orlu-Gul M, Ernest TB, et al. Formulation factors affecting acceptability of oral medicines in children. Int J Pharm. 2015; 492: 341-343. Ref.: https://goo.gl/SsDux5
  23. European Medicines Agencie. Committee for Medicinal Products for Human Use (CHMP) Paediatric Committee (PDCO). Guideline on pharmaceutical development of medicines for paediatric use. 2013.
  24. Zajicek A, Fossler MJ, Barrett JS, Worthington JH, Ternik R, et al. A report from the pediatric formulations task force: perspectives on the state of child-friendly oral dosage forms. AAPS J. 2013; 15: 1072-1081. Ref.: https://goo.gl/Zma5Wg
  25. Ivanovska V, Rademaker CM, van Dijk L, Mantel-Teeuwisse AK. Pediatric drug formulations: a review of challenges and progress. Pediatrics. 2014; 134: 361-372. Ref.: https://goo.gl/rAQsz2
  26. Elder DP, Kuentz M, Holm R. Pharmaceutical excipients - quality, regulatory and biopharmaceutical considerations. Eur J Pharm Sci. 2016; 87: 88-99. Ref.: https://goo.gl/JPfwH9
  27. Ranmal SR, Cram A, Tuleu C. Age-appropriate and acceptable paediatric dosage forms: Insights into end-user perceptions, preferences and practices from the Children’s Acceptability of Oral Formulations (CALF) Study. Int J Pharm. 2016; 514: 296-307. Ref.: https://goo.gl/Ge3AwK
  28. Mennella JA, Roberts KM, Mathew PS, Reed DR. Children’s perceptions about medicines: individual differences and taste. BMC Pediatr. 2015; 15. Ref.: https://goo.gl/Pdn4fz