Archives of Cancer Science and Therapy

Editorial

You Are Here:

Theranostics: A Unique Concept to Nuclear Medicine

Lucio Mango*

Nuclear Medicine Department, S.Camillo-Forlanini General Hospital, Rome, Italy

*Address for Correspondence: Lucio Mango, Nuclear Medicine Department, S.Camillo-Forlanini, General Hospital, Rome, Italy, E-mail: l.mango@scf.gov.it

Dates: Submitted: 19 December 2016; Approved: 20 January 2017; Published: 22 February 2017

How to cite this article: LMango L. Theranostics: A Unique Concept to Nuclear Medicine. Arch Cancer Sci Ther. 2017; 1: 001-004.

Copyright: © 2017 Mango L. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Editorial

Nuclear Medicine is an integral part of modern healthcare. The use of radioactive nuclides tagged biomolecules, evaluating their distribution in human bodies by SPECT or PET systems, provides longitudinal sets of volumetric and quantitative images that can be used to diagnose a wide range of disease and/or assess response to disease specific treatments [1].

Nuclear Medicine therapy, also before known as radio-metabolic, consists in replacing cited diagnostic nuclides with alternative radionuclides that emit a “curative” type of radiations such as beta- or alpha-particles [2].

The eventual presence of a contemporary gamma emission by the nuclide utilized also allows the execution of scintigraphic investigations after its administration, useful for monitoring the distribution of the radio-pharmaceutical in the body and make the most of the time a predictive estimation of the dose received from the target compared to the administered activity [3].

Treatment with radioactive isotopes has been the first clinical application of Nuclear Medicine, when, in the early ‘40s, the Phosphorus-32 was used for polycythemia and some forms of leukemia [4,5] and subsequently the administration of iodine-131 was adopted for the therapy of thyroid disease [4,6]. Than nuclear medicine therapy has come a long and successful road, with the synthesis of many classes of radio-pharmaceuticals, from those receptorial [5] to monoclonal antibodies [7,8], to various molecular probes.

Nuclear medicine treatment presents a very low risk, for example, to cause the onset of cancer in treated subjects, so that often these therapies are also used for benign diseases. Around 3 years ago, more than one hundred nuclear therapy research trials were in progress internationally, particularly in the United States [9]. Nuclear medicine physicians have practiced this form of combined diagnostic-therapeutic procedures for several decades, exploiting known thyroid-selective properties of radioiodine or using small molecule analogs of norepinephrine or engineered biologics, such as peptides, specific for somatostatin receptor [10].

Calculation of the radiation amount absorbed by body tissues is critical for the success of the treatment [11,12]. The objective is to estimate the dose to be administered to the patient as to provide maximum therapeutic effect but at the same time limit excessive irradiation of healthy tissues (especially the bone marrow and kidneys).

As mentioned before can be used a radio-pharmaceutical labelled by a radionuclide with emission of therapeutic radiation such as beta or alpha particles and contemporary gamma emission. This option is not always achieved, but more often it is possible to utilize molecules labelled with different nuclides, gamma rays emitter for diagnosis purpose and the beta- or alpha- particles emitter for treatment. Beta-emitting radioisotopes are classified as low LET and kill cells indirectly, primarily by ionizing reactive oxygen species that cause single-stranded DNA damage.

Alpha particles are the heaviest that are ejected from the nucleus of specific radioactive isotopes and can cause catastrophic damage to the cells in their path. They travel a short linear distance (a few cell diameters) from the decaying nucleus and deposit a very large amount of energy in the path they travel [13].

Authors of many groups have shown the power of molecular targeted α-particle therapy in various preclinical and clinical settings. For example, Wild et al. directly compared the efficacy and toxicity of a bombesin peptide radiolabeled with either an α-particle-emitter (213Bi) or a β particle emitter (177Lu) in a preclinical mouse xenograph model of prostate cancer. They reported that the α-particle therapy had a 100% response rate (70% complete and 30% partial), compared with a 30% response rate (20% complete and 10% partial) for β particle emitter therapy, showing the power of using high-LET molecular targeted therapy [14].

Several study protocols have used radionuclide therapy as an adjuvant to external-beam radiation therapy. Exposure to high-dose-rate external-beam irradiation might be expected to alter the uptake of bone-seeking radiopharmceuticals in the irradiated site, depending on the precise sequence of treament delivery [15]. However response rates are consistently high and treatment is well tolerated, even in heavily pretreated patients [15].

This concept, known as theranostics (therapy-diagnostics) consists in a combination between administration of a biomolecule labelled by a gamma emitter radionuclide for diagnostic scintigraphic purpose and subsequent administration of the same molecule labelled by a radionuclide beta-or alpha-emitter for therapeutic purposes. From an historical perspective, the concept underlying the theranostic strategy are well known in nuclear medicine and constituted the basis of many nuclear imaging procedures currently used in clinical practice [16]. One method for converting a purely imaging probe into a single-entity theranostic agent is by simply switching the radionuclide from a γ-emitter ([111In) to a β-emitter (90Y).

Radiolabeled peptides, for example, have been an important class of compounds in radio-pharmaceutical sciences and nuclear medicine for more than 20 years. Despite strong research efforts, only somatostatin-based radio-peptides have a real impact on patient care, both diagnostically and therapeutically. [111In-diethylenetriaminepentaacetic acid0]-octreotide is commercially available for imaging. Imaging was highly improved by the introduction of PET radionuclides such as 68Ga, 64Cu, and 18F. Two peptides are successfully used in targeted radionuclide therapy when bound to somatostatin and labeled with 90Y and 177Lu [17].

Not only the gamma-emitting radionuclides are used in diagnostics; this is well known in nuclear medicine as long employs positronic nuclides for a better delineation and classification of the tumor mass by means of PET-CT equipment. Currently practiced molecular imaging in the form of PET with the 18F-labeled glucose analog, FDG, has revolutionized medicine, most significantly in oncology. The role of FDG PET, now synonymous with molecular imaging, has become an integral part of patient management for cancer staging, restaging, and monitoring therapy response for a great number of indications [16].

Current nuclear medicine diagnostic techniques include non-invasive Positron Emission Tomography (PET) and Single Photon Emission Computed Tomography (SPECT) utilizing, respectively, positron and gamma emitting radionuclides for the generation of the signal. Both external and internal radiotherapy can be directed by diagnostic PET and SPECT, and diagnostic imaging and radiotherapy are merging into theranostics resulting in more personalized medicine [18].

Most of positronic tracers must be produced by cyclotrons. Except for 18-Fluorine, it is necessary to have the production site close to nuclear medicine departments. Generator-derived radionuclides for PET/CT imaging are promising for optimizing targeted radiotherapy by an individual patient-based approach, applying pre-therapeutic evaluation, as well as dosimetric calculations, and for measuring treatment response after radionuclide therapy [19].

In fact radionuclide generator systems provide an alternative route to access medically relevant radionuclides. The 99Mo/99mTc system, since decades being the prototype of a “medical” radionuclide generator, is still the basic source of diagnostic radio-pharmaceuticals, today covering approximately 80% of all nuclear medical procedures worldwide.

In addition to the 99Mo/99mTc generator, with its daughter nuclide emitting low energetic photon radiation dedicated to SPECT imaging and scintigraphy [20], recent interest has focused on analogue generator systems with potential for molecular imaging using PET, such as the 68Ge/68Ga and 82Sr/82Rb generators. So that, in the context of generator-based positron-emitting radionuclides the concept of theranostics is also true.

Theranostics can leverage nuclear medicine strengths to develop platforms for identifying new biologic targets, predict possible off-target effects, and provide practical means for objective and quantifiable criteria as endpoints in monitoring therapy response. Drugs of most chemical or even inorganic compositions that are designed to be specific for a cellular or biochemical target may be rendered into an imaging agent by the appropriate conjugation with imaging radionuclides that can be detected. This key concept also underscores the value of the latest generation of potentially transformative biomedical materials that are scaled at the nanometer level [10]. Nanoparticles represent an ideally suited theranostic platform predominantly because of their modular construction.

On a purely experimental basis the frontiers of theranostics can turn a therapeutic aid to an imaging agent through appropriate and complex manipulation and labeling with the proper radionuclides. This has demonstrated by some authors who created a positronic prostate tracer from a therapeutic agent [21]. The goal of patient-specific activity prescription offers the only realistic prospect of enhancing response rates within predictable toxicity limits and of progressing beyond symptom palliation to earlier intervention for survival gain [15].

REFERENCES

  1. Adams S, Baum RP, Hertel A, Wenish HJ, Staib-Sebler E, et al. Intraoperative Gamma Probe Detection of Neuroendocrine Tumors. J NucI Med. 1998; 99: 1155-1160. Ref.: https://goo.gl/0uCF8F
  2. Baidoo KE, Yong K, Brechbiel MW. Molecular pathways: targeted α-particle radiation therapy. Clin Cancer Res. 2013; 19: 530-537.Ref.: https://goo.gl/XSRSgu
  3. Czernin J, Benz MR, Allen-Auerbach MS. PET/CT imaging: The incremental value of assessing the glucose metabolic phenotype and the structure of cancers in a single examination. Eur J Radiol. 2010; 73: 470-480. Ref.: https://goo.gl/zabXUf
  4. Das T, Pillai MR. Options to meet the future global demand of radionuclides for radionuclide therapy. Nucl Med and Biol. 2013; 40: 23-32. Ref.: https://goo.gl/EiuUuq
  5. Del Vecchio S, Zannetti A, Fonti R, Pace L, Salvatore M. Nuclear imaging in cancer theranostics. Q J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2007; 5: 152-63. Ref.: https://goo.gl/3wMB7R
  6. Goldenberg DM, Preston DF, Primus FJ, Hansen HJ. Photoscan localization of GW-39 tumors in hamsters using radiolabeled anticarcinoembryonic antigen immunoglobulin G. Cancer Res. 1974; 34: 1-9. Ref.: https://goo.gl/OmrVv1
  7. Goldenberg DM, DeLand F, Kim E, Bennett S, Primus FJ, et al. Use of radiolabeled antibodies to carcinoembryonic antigen for the detection and localization of diverse cancers by external photoscanning. N Engl J Med. 1978; 298: 1384-1386 Ref.: https://goo.gl/Gk1VwV
  8. Hacker M, Beyer T, Baum RP, Kalemis A, Lammertsma AA, et al. Nuclear medicine innovations help (drive) healthcare (benefits). Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2015; 42: 173-175. Ref.: https://goo.gl/vAgYqG
  9. Hamilton JG, Lawrence JH. Recent clinical developments in the therapeutic application of radio-phosphorus and radio-iodine. J Clin Invest. 1942; 21: 624.
  10. Hertz S, Roberts A. Radioactive iodine in the study of thyroid physiology; the use of radioactive iodine therapy in hyperthyroidism. J Am Med assoc. 1946; 131: 81-86. Ref.: https://goo.gl/mmYoKk
  11. Krenning EP, Bakker WH, Breeman WA, Koper JW, Kooij PP, et al. Localisation of endocrine-related tumours with radioiodinated analogue of somatostatin. Lancet. 1989; 1: 242-244. Ref.: https://goo.gl/COL0hA
  12. Lawrence JH. Nuclear physics and therapy. Preliminary report on a new method for the treatment of leukemia and polycythemia vera. Radiology. 1940; 35: 51-60.
  13. Lee DY, Li KC. Molecular theranostics: a primer for the imaging professional. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2011; 197: 318-324. Ref.: https://goo.gl/0h8ZmI
  14. Lewington VJ. Bone-Seeking Radionuclides for Therapy. J Nucl Med. 2005; 46: 38S-47S. Ref.: https://goo.gl/fBQ3R7
  15. Maecke HR, Reubi JC. Somatostatin Receptors as Targets for Nuclear Medicine Imaging and Radionuclide Treatment. J Nucl Med. 2011; 52: 841-844. Ref.: https://goo.gl/cz9aRd
  16. Mango L, Pacilio M. Therapy with Alpha Rays. ARC Journal of Radiology and Medical Imaging. 2016; 1: 1-3.
  17. Pacilio M, Ventroni G, Basile C, Ialongo P, Becci D, et al. Improving the dose-myelotoxicity correlation in radiometabolic therapy of bone metastases with 153Sm-EDTMP. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2014; 41: 238-252. Ref.: https://goo.gl/I1OA8m
  18. Pacilio M, Ventroni G, De Vincentis G, Cassano B, Pellegrini R, et al. Dosimetry of bone metastases in targeted radionuclide therapy with alpha-emitting (223)Ra-dichloride. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2016; 43: 21-33. Ref.: https://goo.gl/HVOEZP
  19. Pacilio M, Ventroni G, Cassano B, Ialongo P, Lorenzon L, et al. A case report of image-based dosimetry of bone metastases with Alpharadin ( (223 Ra)-dichloride) therapy: inter-fraction variability of absorbed dose and follow-up. Ann Nucl Med. 2016; 30: 163-168. Ref.: https://goo.gl/mcOeey
  20. Rösch F, and Baum RP. Generator-based PET radiopharmaceuticals for molecular imaging of tumours: on the way to THERANOSTICS. Dalton Trans. 2011; 40: 6104-6[111. Ref.: https://goo.gl/1KqHaf
  21. Shi J , Liu TWB, Chen J, Green D, Jaffray D, et al. Transforming a Targeted Porphyrin Theranostic Agent into a PET Imaging Probe for Cancer. Theranostics. 2011; 1: 363-370. Ref.: https://goo.gl/Y9YP1L
  22. Velikyan I. Molecular imaging and radiotherapy: Theranostics for Personalized Patient Management. Theranostics. 2012; 2: 424-426. Ref.: https://goo.gl/vzwt6U
  23. Wild D, Frischknecht M, Zhang H, Morgenstern A, Bruchertseifer F, et al. Alpha-versus beta-particle radiopeptide therapy in a human prostate cancer model (213Bi-DOTA-PESIN and 213Bi-AMBA versus 177Lu-DOTA-PESIN). Cancer Res. 2011; 71: 1009-1018. Ref.: https://goo.gl/zxLPpa