Research Article

“Maximum Preservation Radical Prostatectomy”: Oncological, functional and other contemporary aspects of Retzius Sparing Robotic Assisted Radical Prostatectomy

Marcos Tobias-Machado*, Edgar O Sarmento, Igor Nunes-Silva and Hamilton C Zampolli

Published: 04/30/2020 | Volume 4 - Issue 1 | Pages: 024-028

The surgical treatment of prostate cancer (PCa) had as its initial milestone the first prostatectomy, performed by H.H. Young at the Johns Hopkins Hospital, in 1904 [1], however, the procedure only reached a fundamental role after 1982, based on a better understanding and description of the male pelvic anatomy, by Walsh [2-6] and other [7-11].

Read Full Article HTML DOI: 10.29328/journal.acst.1001018 Cite this Article


  1. Young HH. The early diagnosis and radical cure of carcinoma of the prostate - being a study of 40 cases and presentation of a radical operation which was carried out in four cases. 1905. J Urol. 2002;168: 914-921. PubMed:
  2. Walsh PC, Jewett AJ. Radical surgery for prostatic cancer. Cancer 1980; 45: 1906-19011. PubMed:
  3. Walsh PC, Lepor H, Eggleston JC. Radical prostatectomy with preservation of sexual function: anatomical and pathological considerations. Prostate. 1983; 4: 473–485. PubMed:
  4. Walsh PC, Mostwin JL. Radical prostatectomy and cystoprostatectomy with preservation of potency. Results using a new nerve-sparing technique. Br J Urol. 1984; 56: 694– 697. PubMed:
  5. Walsh PC. Radical prostatectomy, preservation of sexual function, cancer control. The controversy. Urol Clin North Am. 1987; 14: 663–673. PubMed:
  6. Walsh PC. Nerve sparing radical prostatectomy for early stage prostate cancer. Semin Oncol. 1988; 15: 351–358. PubMed:
  7. Stenzl A, Colleselli K, Poisel S, Feichtinger H, Pontasch H, et al. Rationale and technique of nerve sparing radical cystectomy before an orthotopic neobladder procedure in women. J Urol. 1995; 154: 2044–2049. PubMed:
  8. Steiner M. Continence preserving anatomic radical prostatectomy. Urology. 2000; 55: 427–435.
  9. Myers RP. Practical surgical anatomy for radical prostatectomy. Urol Clin North Am. 2001; 28: 473–490. PubMed:
  10. Huland H. Morphologic principles for radical prostatectomy. Urologe A. 1991; 30: 361–368. PubMed:
  11. Huland H, Noldus J. An easy and safe approach to separating Denonvilliers’ fascia from rectum during radical retropubic prostatectomy. J Urol. 1999; 161: 1533–1534. PubMed:
  12. Schuessler WW, Schulam PG, Clayman RV, Kavoussi LR. Laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: initial short-term experience. Urology. 1997; 50: 854-8547. PubMed:
  13. Binder J, Kramer W. Robotically-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy. BJU Int. 2001; 87: 408-410. PubMed:
  14. Checcucci E, Veccia A, Fiori C, Amparore D, Manfred M, et al. Retzius-sparing robot-assisted radical prostatectomy vs the standard approach: a systematic review and analysis of comparative outcomes. BJU Int. 2019; 125: 8-16. PubMed:
  15. Kim SP, Boorjian SA, Shah ND, Weight CJ, Tilburt JC, et al. Disparities in access to hospitals with robotic surgery for patients with prostate cancer undergoing radical prostatectomy. J Urol. 2013; 189: 514–520. PubMed:
  16. Rassweiler J, Seemann O, Schulze M, Teber D, Hatzinger M, et al. Laparoscopic versus open radical prostatectomy: a comparative study at a single institution. J Urol. 2003; 169: 1689–1693. PubMed:
  17. Asimakopoulos AD, Miano R, Galfano A, Bocciardi AM, Vespasiani G, et al. Retzius-sparing robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: Critical appraisal of the anatomic landmarks for a complete intrafascial approach. Clin Anat. 2015; 28: 896-902. PubMed:
  18. Walz J, Burnett AL, Costello AJ, Eastham JA, Graefen M, et al. A critical analysis of the current knowledge of surgical anatomy related to optimization of cancer control and preservation of continence and erection in candidates for radical prostatectomy. Eur Urol. 2010; 57: 179–192. PubMed:
  19. Tewari A, Takenaka A, Mtui E, et al. The proximal neurovascular plate and the trizonal neural architecture around the prostate gland: importance in the athermal robotic technique of nerve sparing prostatectomy. BJU Int. 2006; 98: 314–323. PubMed:
  20. Tewari A, Peabody JO, Fischer M, Sarle R, Vallancien G, et al. An operative and anatomic study to help in nerve sparing during laparoscopic and robotic radical prostatectomy. Eur Urol 2003; 43: 444–454. PubMed:
  21. Takenaka A, Kawada M, Murakami G, Hisasue S, Tsukamoto T, et al. Inter individual variation in distribution of extramural ganglion cells in the male pelvis: a semi- quantitative and immu-nohistochemical study concerning nerve-sparing pelvic surgery. Eur Urol. 2005; 48: 46–52.
  22. Savera AT, Kaul S, Badani K, Stark AT, Shah NL, et al. Robotic radical prostatectomy with the “veil of Aphrodite” technique: histologic evidence of enhanced nerve sparing. Eur Urol. 2006; 49: 1065–1074. PubMed:
  23. Galfano A, Ascione A, Grimaldi S, Petralia G, Strada E, et al. A New Anatomic Approach for Robot-Assisted Laparoscopic Prostatectomy: A Feasibility Study for Completely Intrafascial Surgery. European Urology. 2010; 58: 457-461. PubMed:
  24. Guillonneau B, Vallancian G. Laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: the Montsouris technique. J Urol. 2000; 163: 1643–1649. PubMed:
  25. Coughlin G, Dangle PP, Palmer KJ, Samavedi S, Patel VR. Athermal early retrograde release of the neurovascular bundle during nerve-sparing robotic-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy. J Robotic Surg. 2009; 3: 13–17. PubMed:
  26. Patel VR Schatloff O, Chauhan S, Sivaraman A, Valero R, et al. The role of the prostatic vasculature as a landmark for nerve sparing during robot-assisted radical prostatectomy. Eur Urol. 2012; 61: 571– 576. PubMed:
  27. Patel VR, Shah K, Palmer KJ, Thaly R, Coughlin G. Robotic-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: a report of the current state. Expert Rev Anticancer Ther. 2007; 7: 1269- 1278. PubMed:
  28. Genes WP, Bicudo MC, Machado PM, Auad PR, Pacheco LE, et al. Retzius Sparing (RS) Robotic Assisted Radical Prostatectomy (RARP) and Retzius Space Reconstruction T echnique after RARP Improve Urinary Continence Compared to Conventional RARP (C-RARP): Systematic Review and Metanalysis Int Arch Urol Complic 2019; 5: 065.
  29. Galfano A, Ascione A, Grimaldi S, Petralia G, Strada E, et al. A new anatomic approach for robot-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy: A feasibility study for completely intrafascial surgery. Eur Urol. 2019; 58: 457-461. PubMed:
  30. Galfano A, Di Trapani D, Sozzi F, Strada E, Petralia G, et al. Beyond the learning curve of the retzius-sparing approach for robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: Oncologic and functional results of the first 200 patients with ≥1 Year of follow- up. Eur Urol. 2019; 64: 974-980. PubMed:
  31. de Carvalho PA, Barbosa JABA, Guglielmetti GB, Cordeiro MD, Rocco B, et al. Retrograde Release of the Neurovascular Bundle with Preservation of Dorsal Venous Complex During Robot-assisted Radical Prostatectomy: Optimizing Functional Outcomes. Eur Urol. 2020; 77: 628-635. PubMed:
  32. Patel VR, Sivaraman A, Coelho RF, Chauhan S, Palmer KJ, et al. Pentafecta: a new concept for reporting outcomes of robot-assisted laparoscopic radical pros-tatectomy. Eur Urol. 2011; 59: 702–707. PubMed:
  33. Patel VR, Abdul-Muhsin HM, Schatloff O, Coelho RF, Valero R, et al. Critical review of “pentafecta” outcomes after robot-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy in high-volume centres. BJU Int. 2011; 108: 1007-1017. PubMed:
  34. Tai TE, Wu CC, Kang YN, Wu JC. Effects of Retzius sparing on robot assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy: a systematic review with meta-analysis. Surg Endosc. 2019. PubMed:
  35. Stonier T, Simson N, Davis J, Challacombe B. Retzius-sparing robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (RS-RARP) vs standard RARP: it’s time for critical appraisal. BJU Int. 2019; 123: 5-7. PubMed:
  36. Tewari A, Sooriakumaran P, Bloch DA, Seshadri-Kreaden U, Hebert AE, et al. Positive Surgical Margin and Perioperative Complication Rates of Primary Surgical Treatments for Prostate Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis Comparing Retropubic, Laparoscopic, and Robotic Prostatectomy. Eur Urol. 2012; 62: 1-15. PubMed:
  37. Lim SK, Kim KH, Shin TY, Han WK, Chung BH, et al. Retzius-sparing robot- assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: Combining the best of retropubic and perineal approaches. BJU Int. 2014; 114: 236-244. PubMed:
  38. Eden CG. Retzius-sparing robotic radical prostatectomy. Asian J Androl. 2020; 22: 149–151. PubMed:
  39. Eden CG, Moschonas D, Soares R. Urinary continence four weeks following Retzius- sparing robotic radical prostatectomy: the UK experience. J Clin Urol. 2017; 72: 677–685.
  40. Phukan C, McLean A, Nambiar A, Mukherjee A, Somani B, et al. Retzius sparing robotic assisted radical prostatectomy vs. Conventional robotic assisted radical prostatectomy: a systematic review and metaanalysis. World J Urol. 2019. PubMed:
  41. Santok GD, Abdel Raheem A, Kim LHC, Chang K, Lum TGH, et al. Perioperative and short-term outcomes of Retzius-sparing robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy stratified by gland size. BJU Int. 2017; 119: 135-141. PubMed:
  42. Menon M, Dalela D, Jamil M, Diaz M, Tallman C, et al. Functional recovery, oncologic outcomes and postoperative complications after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: An evidence-based analysis comparing the retzius sparing and standard approaches. J Urol. 2018; 199: 1210-1217. PubMed:
  43. Chang LW, Hung SC, Hu JC, Chiu KY. Retzius- sparing robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy associated with less bladder neck descent and better early continence outcome. Anticancer Res. 2018; 38: 345-351. PubMed:
  44. Dalela D, Jeong W, Prasad M-A, Sood A, Abdollah F, et al.  A pragmatic randomized controlled trial examining the impact of the retzius-sparing approach on early urinary continence recovery after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy. Eur Urol. 2017; 72: 677-685.  PubMed:
  45. Cadeddu JA. Re: a pragmatic randomized controlled trial examining the impact of the Retzius-sparing approach on early urinary continence recovery after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy. J Urol. 2018; 199: 875–876. PubMed:
  46. Nyarangi-Dix JN, Görtz M, Gradinarov G, Hofer L, Schütz V, et al. Retzius-sparing robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: functional and early oncologic results in aggressive and locally advanced prostate cancer. BMC Urol. 2019; 19: 113.
  47. Phukan C, Mclean A, Nambiar A, Mukherjee A, Somani B, et al. Retzius Sparing Robotic Assisted Radical Prostatectomy vs. Conventional Robotic Assisted Radical Prostatectomy: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis World J Urol. 2019. PubMed:
  48. Abu-Ghanem Y, Dotan Z, Ramon J, Zilberman DE Retzius space reconstruction following transperitoneal laparoscopic robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: does it have any added value? J Robot Surg; 2018; 12: 475-479. PubMed:
  49. Tobias-Machado M, Nunes-Silva I, Hidaka AK, Sato LL, Almeida R, et al. Retzus-sparing robotic-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: a step–by-step technique description of this first brazilian experience. Int Braz J Urol. 2016; 42: 1250-1250. PubMed:
  50. De Rooij M, Nieuwboer W, Smit RNG, Witjes JA, Barentsz JO, et al. 630 The high economic burden of urinary incontinence after prostate cancer treatment. Eur Urol. 2015; 14: e630–e630a.
  51. Olivero A, Galfano A, Piccinelli M, Secco S, Di Trapani D, et al. Retzius sparing Robotic Radical Prostatectomy for Surgeons in the Learning Curve: A Propensity Score-matching Analysis. Eur Urol Focus. 2020; pii: S2405-4569(20)30073-0. PubMed:
  52. Nyarangi-Dix JN, Görtz M, Gradinarov G, Hofer L, Schütz V, et al. Retzius-sparing robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: functional and early oncologic results in aggressive and locally advanced prostate cancer. BMC Urol. 2019; 19: 113.
  53. Asimakopoulos AD, Corona Montes VE, Gaston R. Robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy with intrafascial dissection of the neurovascular bundles and preservation of the pubovesical complex: a step-by-step description of the technique. J Endourol. 2012; 26: 1578-1585. PubMed:
  54. Agarwal DK, Sharma V, Toussi A, Viers BR, Tollefson MK, et al.
  55. Initial Experience with da Vinci Single-port Robot-assisted Radical Prostatectomies. Eur Urol. 2020; 77: 373-379. PubMed: