Volume 3 Issue 1
2019-12-27 Research Article
Abstract
Five experimental feeding trials were conducted to investigate the performance of Heterobranchus bidorsalis fingerlings to graded levels (0, 25, 50,75 and 100%) of Sphenostylis stenocarpa seed meal diets. Complete randomized design with triplicate groups of fingerlings was used for the study for ten weeks. The proximate, anti-nutritional factor and amino acid profile of the S. stenocarpa was analysed. The study showed that treatment C with 50% inclusion of Sphenostylis stenocarpa meal was significantly different (p < 0.05) and performed best among other treatments in terms of the net weight gain, standard growth rate, and survival. The feed conversion ratio was best in treatment C but not significantly different (p > 0.05) to other treatments.
Abstract Read Full Article HTML DOI: 10.29328/journal.afns.1001019 Cite this Article
2019-06-27 Review Article
Abstract
During the last three decades, there has been an interesting debate on the intake of A1 ‘like” milk and incidence of type 1 diabetes (T1D) in genetically predisposed individuals. The epidemiological, ecological and case-control studies have concrete pieces of evidences in favor of the hypothesis that is further supported by animal trials in mice and rat and in vitro trials on cell lines. But on the other hand, European Food Safety Authority reported that there isn’t sufficient data to draw a final recommendation at this stage in terms of contradictory results, lack of cause-effect relationship and being a mere suggestive evidence [1]. However, the report itself states that these studies are strong enough to formulate a concrete hypothesis and further research is needed to confirm the same. Keeping in view the published data in favor of the hypothesis and the counter-arguments, it is suggested that further research with well-designed animal and in vitro trials with intact proteins and peptides is needed to fully confirm the hypothesis. Until the issue is fully resolved, it’s the personal choice of the individuals at risk to T1D (genetically predisposed) to either remove A1 “like” or increase the A2 “like” milk from their diet.
Abstract Read Full Article HTML DOI: 10.29328/journal.afns.1001018 Cite this Article
2019-01-14 Research Article
Abstract
The study aimed to identify possible environmental risk factors for breast cancer among women in Gaza Strip and conducted in 2010. A case- control study design was used with face to face interviews by structured questionnaire with breast cancer patient women as well as healthy women. Statistical Package of Social Science (SPSS) was used to analyze the collected data. The study population was 288 women, 144 were women with breast cancer (cases) and 144 were healthy women (controls) with response rate 100% for cases as well as controls. The study was carried out in the two main hospitals in Gaza Strip (El-Shifa and European Gaza) and on cases who had a regular follow up in each hospital, while controls have been chosen from women who had no history of breast cancer by mammogram or by self-examination. In this study the main statistically significant risk factors were; marital status, educational status, physical trauma on breast, medication for infertility treatment, eating red meat 500g or more weekly, eating canned food, eating chicken skin, eating raw and cooked vegetables, using oils with saturated fats in cooking, living in or beside a farm, dealing with crops with naked hands, working in a farm during pesticides application or during 24 hours of pesticides application, cleaning pesticides’ equipment, living with people working in a farm or a agricultural field, and application of pesticides personally. In contrary, no statistically significant differences were found between cases and controls in relation to area of residency, exposure to X-ray in the past, having radiation therapy, getting contraceptive pills, using hair dyes, using anti-deodorant underarm, using facial cosmetics, using hair removal ointment, washing vegetables and fruits, buying and transporting pesticides, and wearing protective tools during pesticides mixing and application.
Abstract Read Full Article HTML DOI: 10.29328/journal.afns.1001017 Cite this Article
Recent Articles
2021-04-26 Case Report
Georg Christoph Brunauer*, Alina Meindl, Bernhard Rotter, Alfred Gruber and Christoph Slouka
Abstract Read Full Article HTML DOI: 10.29328/journal.afns.1001029 Citation
2021-03-12 Review Article
Hossein Delshad and Fereidoun Azizi*
Abstract Read Full Article HTML DOI: 10.29328/journal.afns.1001028 Citation
2021-03-08 Research Article
Ramona Fochesato, Sara Guidotti and Carlo Pruneti*
Abstract Read Full Article HTML DOI: 10.29328/journal.afns.1001027 Citation
2021-02-03 Research Article
Hossein Delshad, Parvin Mirmiran, Ladan Mehran, Maryam Tohidi and Fereidoun Azizi*
Abstract Read Full Article HTML DOI: 10.29328/journal.afns.1001026 Citation
2020-12-29 Research Article
Adakole MI, Ikya JK, Girgih AT, Ogori AF* and Upev V
Abstract Read Full Article HTML DOI: 10.29328/journal.afns.1001025 Citation
2020-11-16 Research Article
Miriam Sosa*, Paula Cardinal, Eliana Elizagoyen, Graciela Rodríguez, Soledad Arce, M Fernanda Gugole Ottaviano, Victoria Pieroni and Lorena Garitta
Abstract Read Full Article HTML DOI: 10.29328/journal.afns.1001023 Citation
2020-06-03 Research Article
2020-05-29 Opinion
Anjana Agarwal*
Abstract Read Full Article HTML DOI: 10.29328/journal.afns.1001021 Citation
2020-03-10 Review Article
Gargi Sen*, Nilanjan Sarkar, Moutusi Nath and Subhasis Maity
Abstract Read Full Article HTML DOI: 10.29328/journal.afns.1001020 Citation