More Information

Submitted: 18 June 2019 | Approved: 04 July 2019 | Published: 05 July 2019

How to cite this article: El-Sayed H, Mehanna S, Hassan A, Sheded M, Elmaraghy N, et al. Knowledge, perception and practices of Suez Canal University students regarding Hepatitis C Virus infection risk and means of prevention. Int J Clin Microbiol Biochem Technol. 2019; 2: 020-027.
DOI: 10.29328/journal.ijcmbt.1001007

Copyright License: © 2019 El-Sayed H, et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Keywords: Knowledge; Perception; Practices; HCV; Students

 FullText PDF

Knowledge, perception and practices of Suez Canal University students regarding Hepatitis C Virus infection risk and means of prevention

Hesham El-Sayed1, Sohair Mehanna2, Adel Hassan3, Mahmoud Sheded4, Maha Abdel-Fattah5, Samar Elfiky6, Nermine Elmaraghy7*, Nehal Lotfy8 and Zeinab Khadr9

1Department of Pediatrics, Faculty of Medicine, Suez Canal University, Ismailia, Egypt
2Social Research Center, American University, Cairo, Egypt
3Department of Infectious and Endemic Diseases, Faculty of Medicine, Suez Canal University, Ismailia, Egypt
4Department of Infectious and Endemic Diseases, Faculty of Medicine, Suez University, Suez, Egypt
5Department of Rheumatology and Rehabilitation, Faculty of Medicine, Suez Canal University, Ismailia, Egypt
6Department of Pediatrics, Faculty of Medicine, Suez Canal University, Ismailia, Egypt
7Medical Microbiology & Immunology Department, Faculty of Medicine, Suez Canal University; 41111 ring road, Ismailia, Egypt
8Faculty of Education, Suez Canal University, Ismailia, Egypt
9Social Research Center, American University, Cairo, Egypt

*Address for Correspondence: Nermine El Maraghy, Medical Microbiology & Immunology Department, Faculty of Medicine, Suez Canal University; 41111 ring road, Ismailia, Egypt, Email:

Background: Egypt has the highest prevalence of HCV in the world as more than 10% of population suffers from HCV infection. High prevalence of HCV in Egypt represents a great risk to the whole population that requires aggressive mass awareness regarding routes of infection and means of prevention.

Aim: To determine the knowledge and practices of university students in 5 different faculties in Suez Canal University regarding HCV infection and means of prevention.

Materials and method: A cross sectional study was conducted in five university faculties in Suez Canal University.

Results: The study included 698 students from the faculties of Medicine, Pharmacy, Dentistry, Nursing and Education in Suez Canal University in Ismailia city in Egypt. There was a statistically significant difference regarding the knowledge about the diagnosis, complications and routes of transmission total knowledge score for HCV among the different faculties.

Conclusion and Recommendations: Knowledge and practices of university students in Suez Canal University is partial to weak especially in students of non-biological sciences who have less close contact with patients.

The global prevalence of Hepatitis C virus (HCV) is a major health problem in Egypt as it`s prevalence is reaching 13% of the population. Also, it is considered a serious social and economic problem that needs a lot of effort to eradicate it [1]. Liver related death, liver cirrhosis and hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) are the end results of untreated HCV patients [2].

In 2015, the burden of HCV on the Egyptian economy was estimated around $3.81 billion due to consumption of the health facilities and indirectly due to disability and loss of life [3].

Health care providers (HCP) such as physicians, nurses, laboratory staff and medical students are usually at great risk of exposure [4]. Among these, HCV is transmitted through contaminated surgical instruments, needles [5], skin prick, injection drug use [6] and blood transfusion [7]. Also, HCP infected with HCV are at great risk of discrimination and stigmatization at their work by their colleagues and even by their family members due to poor knowledge and lack of awareness of viral transmission [8,9]. In order to eliminate the infection with this major health public issue, it is important to be strict with the infection control guidelines [10].

In Egypt, a survey was conducted on 278 universities where 1,319,525 undergraduate students enrolled. But due to the asymptomatic characteristics of HCV infection, university students who are infected could easily infect others without knowing that [11].

Promoting insightful awareness of university students toward this major health problem will gradually help in eliminating this problem. If students do not have access to information about the disease, then they are not likely to have sufficient knowledge or be concerned of contracting it. The state should aim to raise a generation of students, aware of the burden of HCV infection in Egypt, and who will be willing to accept responsibility to expend their efforts in the future to limit HCV infection.

The aim of this study is to measure the level of knowledge of university students and their perception regarding HCV infection, and means of its prevention, in order to adequately plan an intervention program to reduce the risk of infection and thus lower the infection rates.

Statistical analysis

Data collected through the questionnaire was coded, entered and analyzed using Microsoft Excel software. Data was then imported into Statistical Package for the Social Sciences (SPSS version 18.0) software for analysis.

Chi square test for qualitative variables, paired t test, and one-way ANOVA with least significance difference. Multiple regression analysis was used to test relationship between different dependent and independent variables were used and specify what they were used for just as the multiple regression. P value will be set at <0.05 for significant results.

Ethical consideration

The Ethics Committee in Faculty of medicine Suez Canal University approved this work according to the declaration of Helsinki. Also, the Research Ethical Committee of Egyptian Ministry of Health and Population Central Directorate for Research and Health Development approved the study. Consent for an interview was taken from each participant, who was assured about the confidentiality of his/her information.

PA cross sectional study conducted in Ismailia at Suez Canal University from April 2015 till February 2018 on 698 university students in 5 faculties: Education, Nursing, Medicine, Pharmacy and Dentistry. This sample size is a stratified cluster sample with clusters representing the 5 faculties and from each faculty sample random sample was drawn.

The data were collected through a self-administered questionnaire composed of 45 questions to determine the demographic, social and behavioral characteristics of the studied population. Also their knowledge and perception of the possible social and behavioral risk factors for HCV infection and its transmission were queried.

As well as the method of HCV prevention the infection control procedures which include questions about the sterilization and disinfection, hand washing, care of sharp, needle stick injury and ways to deal with it, dealing with blood spoilage, regular check-ups and HB virus vaccination. All the data were kept confidential throughout the steps of work and were only accessible to the team members.

This cross sectional study was carried out on 698 students from the faculties of Medicine, Pharmacy, Dentistry, Nursing and Education in Suez Canal University to determine the knowledge, perception and practices of those students regarding HCV infection and means of prevention.

Table 1 shows that the mean age of the participants was 20.74± 1.31. 52% of the sample was in the age group 19- 21 years.

Table 1: Background characteristics of the studied sample (n=698).
Variables Categories Frequency (%)
Age (years) 17 – 19 146(20.9)
19- 21 362(52.1)
22 -24 190(27.3)
Mean ± SD= 20.74±1.31
Range (17 – 24)
Gender Male 155(22.2)
Female 543(77.8)
Faculty Medicine 204(29.2)
Pharmacy 96(13.8)
Nursing 193(27.7)
Dentistry 76(10.9)
Education 129(18.5)
School Year 1st 84(12)
2nd 108(15.5)
3rd 67(9.6)
4th 314(45)
5th 73(10.5)
6th 52(7.4)

Table 2 shows that 98.4% of the students have heard about hepatitis C, and 95.6% of them know that it is prevalent in Egypt.

Table 2: Knowledge about Hepatitis C virus and its prevalence (n=698).
Variables Categories Frequency (%)
Have you heard about Hepatitis C Yes 688(98.5)
No 10(1.4)
Do you think HCV is prevalent in Egypt Yes 669(95.8)
No 10(1.4)
I do not know 19(2.7)
How did you hear about HCV Studies 461(66.5)
TV 450(64.9)
Radio 61(8.8)
Magazines 141(20.3)
Brochures and posters 179(25.8)
Seminars 130(18.8)
Primary health care units 175(25.3)
Relatives and neighbors 412(59)
Other 23(3.3)

Table 3 shows the proportion of correct answers toward each Hepatitis C knowledge question. There was a statistically significant difference regarding the knowledge about the symptoms, diagnosis, complications and routes of transmission among the different faculties.

Table 3: correct knowledge answers toward hepatitis C in association with students’ field of study.
Domain Correct Answers No (%) P value
Symptoms Urine Color Change 161 (78.9) 44 (47.3) 79 (41.4) 25 (45.5) 41 (31.8) <0.001**
Vomiting 79 (38.7) 12 (12.9) 63 (33) 9 (16.4) 20 (15.5) <0.001**
Anorexia 130 (63.7) 28(30.1) 104(54.5) 17(30.9) 31(24) <0.001**
Jaundice 156(76.5) 55(59.1) 131(68.6) 28(50.9) 67(51.9) <0.001**
Abdominal Pain 123(60.3) 35(37.6) 81(42.4) 24(43.6) 41(31.8) <0.001**
Hematemesis 118(57.8) 36(38.7) 116(60.7) 26(47.3) 27(20.9) <0.001**
Diarrhea 174(85.3) 85(91.4 171(89.5 47(85.5 118(91.5) 0.32
Muscle Cramps 195(95.6) 89(95.7) 185(96.9) 51(92.7) 122(94.6) 0.72
Average score ± SD 5.56±1.33 4.12±1.14 4.86±1.29 4.12±1.22 3.62±1.14 <0.001**
Diagnosis By Symptoms of the disease 93(45.8) 67(71.3) 100(52.4) 33(50.8) 84(65.1) 0.19
By Patient Complaint 149(73.4) 78(83) 136(71.2) 50(76.9) 110(85.3) <0.001**
By a Physician 123(60.6) 67(71.3) 104(54.5) 41(63.1) 84(65.1) 0.09
By Special Investigations 184(90.6) 83(88.3) 173(90.6) 50(76.9) 99(76.7) <0.001**
By the Pharmacist 202(99.5) 88(93.6) 189(99) 62(95.4) 128(99.2) 0.002*
Average score ± SD 3.7±1.08 4.07±1.08 3.6±1.15 3.63±0.89 3.91±0.91 0.009**
Complications Cirrhosis 196(97) 91(97.8) 178(93.2) 50(90.9) 95(73.6) <0.001**
Myocardial infarction 193(95.5) 92(98.9) 184(96.3) 53(96.4) 124(96.1) 0.70
Hypertension 170(84.2) 85(91.4) 165(86.4) 48(87.3) 120(93) 0.12
Immunodeficiency 130(64.4) 62(66.7) 119(62.3) 34(61.8) 91(70.5) 0.60
Hepatocellular Carcinoma 156(77.2) 28(30.1) 89(46.6) 23(41.8) 37(28.7) <0.001**
Hepatic Encephalopathy 138(68.3) 7(7.5) 62(32.5) 5(9.1) 5(3.9) <0.001**
Kidney Disease 38(18.8) 5(5.4) 15(7.9) 5(9.1) 16(12.4) 0.002*
Average score ± SD 5.05±1.02 3.97±0.71 4.25±1.05 3.96±0.86 3.78±1.04 <0.001**
Domain Correct Answers No (%) P value
Routes of Transmission Sharing Toothbrush 128(62.7) 68(72.3) 160(83.8) 29(48.3) 67(51.9) <0.001**
Sharing Towels 196(96.1) 89(94.7) 165(86.4) 52(86.7) 109(84.5) 0.001**
Sharing Clothes 199(97.5) 89(94.7) 170(89) 55(91.7) 111(86) 0.001**
Sharing Razors 183(89.7) 81(86.2) 167(87.4) 39(65) 70(54.3) <0.001**
Hand shaking 202(99) 89(94.7) 182(95.3) 57(95) 119(92.2) 0.04*
Kissing 189(92.6) 87(92.6) 171(89.5) 55(91.7) 117(90.7) 0.83
Blood transfusion 191(94.1) 83(88.3) 174(91.1) 47(78.3) 86.(66.7) <0.001**
Contaminated Toilets 179(87.7) 77(81.9) 126(66) 46(76.7) 83(64.3) <0.001**
Sharing Utensils 183(89.7) 73(77.7) 135(70.7) 52(86.7) 99(76.7) <0.001**
Sharing nail scissors 139(68.1) 71(75.5) 144(75.4) 30(50) 53(41.4) <0.001**
Sharing glucose checking devices 144(70.6) 68(72.3) 108(56.5) 28(46.7) 38(29.5) <0.001**
Via Dentists 182(89.2) 83(88.3) 149(78) 31(51.7) 56(434) <0.001**
Via Barbers 186(91.2) 86(91.5) 156(81.7) 37(61.7) 65(50.4) <0.001**
Via nail trimming 94(46.1) 55(58.5) 117(61.3) 14(23.3) 32(24.8) <0.001**
Via illicit drug use 146(71.6) 31(33) 71(37.7) 17(28.3) 15(11.6) <0.001**
Via sexual relations 118(57.8) 62(66) 117(61.3) 52(86.7) 103(79.8) <0.001**
Via Insects 117(86.8) 40(42.6) 112(58.6) 47(78.3) 104(80.6) <0.001**
From mother to fetus 137(67.2) 41(43.6) 113(59.2) 48(80) 107(82.9) <0.001**
Via smoking shisha 197(96.6) 84(89.4) 157(82.2) 56(93.3) 110(85.3) <0.001**
Average score ± SD 15.9±2.07 15.07±2.02 14.62±2.57 13.98±2.56 12.72±2.28 <0.001**
Total Score Average score ± SD 30.23±3.22 27.24±2.85 27.41±3.51 26.04±3.76 24.05±3.26 <0.001**
*Significant p-value ≤0.05, **highly significant p-value ≤0.01. T-test or chi square test, as appropriate

Table 4 shows the proportion of students that were exposed to blood products, spilling and needle stick injuries.

Table 4: Exposure to risk of Hepatitis C virus infection in relation to students’ field of study.
Risk Medicine
P value
Exposure to blood products 125(61.3) 19(19.8) 126(66.3) 21(31.3) 5(3.9) <0.001**
Exposure to needle stick injuries 31(15.3) 44(45.8) 76(40) 28(41.8) 41(33.3) <0.001**
Exposure to blood spilling 50(24.8) 12(12.5) 92(48.7) 20(29) 3(2.3) <0.001**
*Significant p-value ≤0.05, **highly significant p-value ≤0.01. Chi square test, as appropriate

Table 5 shows that there was a significant difference regarding receiving infection control training, using protective gloves during risky procedures and complying with hand washing practices, with the highest percentage among nursing students.

Table 5: Perceptions and protective practices related to prevention in relation to students’ field of study.
Perception/Protective Practice Medicine
P value
Receiving Vaccination to Hepatitis Virus 93(45.6) 45(46.9) 93(48.2) 32(42.1) 64(49.6) 0.59
Receiving Infection Control Training 87(42.6) 21(21.9) 154(79.8) 26(34.2) 19(14.7) <0.001**
Using Protective Gloves during risky Procedures 165(80.9) 75(78.1) 166(86) 42(55.3) 85(65.9) <0.001**
Complying with hand-washing practices 167(81.9) 88(91.7) 186(96.4) 57(75) 117(90.7) <0.001**
*Significant p-value ≤0.05, **highly significant p-value ≤0.01. Chi square test, as appropriate

Table 6 shows that there was no statistically significant difference among the different faculty students regarding engaging in dangerous practices that may lead to hepatitis C transmission.

Table 6: Number and Percentage of students who engage in dangerous practices in relation to study specialty
Dangerous Practices Medicine
P value
Tattoos 10(4.9) 2(2.1) 6(3.2) 2(2.8) 3(2.3) 0.22
Piercing 85(42.3) 49(51) 70(37.2) 33(49.3) 79(61.7) <0.001**
Nail trimming at barber’s shop 21(10.3) 7(7.3) 24(12.6) 11(15.5) 28(21.9) 0.02*
Shaving (for males) 39(46.4) 7(46.7) 25(29.8) 7(18.9) 8(50) 0.02*
Acupuncture 4(2) 4(4.2) 5(2.6) 1(1.6) 1(0.8) 0.52
Cupping 3(1.5) 2(2.1) 3(1.6) 2(2.1) 2(1.6) 0.92
Using used syringes 0(0) 1(1) 2(1.1) 0(0) 0(0) 0.38
Sharing razors 11(9.6) 3(20) 4(3.7) 3(5.5) 3(16.7) 0.07
Sharing toothbrushes 0(0) 0(0) 0(0) 4(5.4) 0(0) <0.001**
Sharing scissors 122(60.1) 73(76) 129(68.3) 48(67.6) 102(79.7) 0.002**
Average Score ± SD 1.4±0.9 1.6±0.9 1.5±1.2 1.6±0.9 1.9±1.2 0.75
*Significant p-value ≤0.05, **highly significant p-value ≤0.01. T-test or chi square test, as appropriate

Table 7 shows that there was no significant difference between males and females regarding knowledge about hepatitis C. There was a statistically significant difference between different faculties as well as between different years (p<0.001).

Table 7: Knowledge, perception and practices of medical students in relation to the demographic characteristics.
No (%) Mean± SD knowledge score P value Mean± SD Dangerous practice score P value
Gender Male 155(22.7) 27.7±4.2 NS 1.6±1.1 0.77
Female 543(77.8) 27.4±3.9 1.3±1.1
Faculty Medicine 204(29.2) 30.2±3.2 <0.001** 1.4±0.9 0.75
Pharmacy 96(13.8) 27.2±2.8 1.6±0.9
Nursing 193(27.7) 27.4±3.5 1.5±1.2
Dentistry 76(10.9) 26.7±3.8 1.6±0.9
Education 129(18.5) 24.04±3.2 1.9±1.2
Year of study 1st 84(12) 25.2±3.2 <0.001** 1.5±0.9 0.88
2nd 108(15.5) 24.5±3.9 1.7±1.1
3rd 67(9.6) 27.7±3.4 1.5±1.2
4th 314(45) 28.2±3.7 1.5±1.3
5th 73(10.5) 27.8±3 1.5±1.3
6th 52(7.4) 27.4±3.9 1.4±0.9
Receiving Infection control
Yes 298 28.2±3.6 <0.001** 1.4±1.1 0.30
No 353 27±4.1 1.6±1.2
Receiving HBV vaccine Yes 320 27.7±3.9 NS 1.6±1.2 0.39
No 323 27.3±3.9 1.4±0.9

Students receiving infection control trainings had a statistically higher mean knowledge score than those who did not attend trainings.

Table 8 shows that Stepwise backward regression analysis model of significance best-fitting predictors of knowledge about hepatitis C, were Faculty of Medicine (t=8.9, p<0.001), Faculty of education (t= -8.4, p<0.001), Age (t=3.6, p<0.001).

Table 8: Multiple Stepwise regression analysis of knowledge among the studied groups.
Model Unstandardized Coefficients Standardized Coefficients t P value
B Std. Error Beta
(Constant) 17.311 2.483 6.971 <0.001**
Faculty of Medicine 2.820 0.317 0.327 8.897 <0.001**
Faculty of Education -2.922 0.348 -0.294 -8.387 <0.001**
Age 0.411 0.115 0.130 3.573 <0.001**
Gender 0.759 0.313 0.080 2.423 0.016*
R= 0.56.

The present study shows that the mean level of knowledge among university students was generally low. With the exception of faculty of medicine, students from all other faculties displayed lack of knowledge regarding the symptoms, diagnosis, routes of transmission and complications of the disease. There was positive correlation between the faculty of Medicine and good knowledge about hepatitis C. Also, there were significantly lower knowledge scores among students of the faculty of education, as well as a negative correlation between knowledge and the faculty of education.

In a report by [11], in Pakistan, the survey showed fair level of knowledge among university students regarding hepatitis B and C, but gaps in knowledge were identified which need to be strengthened in students especially in non-biological sciences group. These results agree with those found in a survey in Iran where the knowledge of students with respect to the type of hepatitis (A, B, C, D and E) was very weak [12].

Our results showed that medical students had the highest knowledge score, followed by nursing students due to their basic knowledge .In a survey by [13]. On the knowledge of health care workers about HCV, the mean knowledge level score was acceptable and doctors were the most knowledgeable group too.

There was no significant difference between males and females regarding knowledge or dangerous practices [14], also found that there was no significant difference between genders regarding knowledge, however, in their study it was shown that female students had more positive attitudes than male students towards risk taking and prevention of hepatitis C.

Knowledge among dental students in our study was found to be low. This is contrary to the results found in a study by [15]. In Bulgaria on dental medicine students, where the majority of participants in the study showed high or average rate of knowledge concerning HCV route of transmission and prevention. Similar results were found in previous studies assessing Hepatitis knowledge in dental students and dentists worldwide [16-18].

Unlike the present study, where the proportion of dentistry students complying with hand washing and using protective gloves was lowest, in Todorova’s work, it was found that students in the faculty of Dental Medicine were relatively aware of current risk posed by hepatitis in dental practice and knew how to protect themselves and patients from hepatitis spread. As the knowledge of this group about the prevention and transmission of hepatitis was not high, it is predictable that they do not follow preventive strategies completely. In a study in a teaching hospital in Lahore, it was determined that lack of awareness was the commonest reason for not being vaccinated against hepatitis B [19].

In our study, less than half of the students with different faculties received hepatitis vaccination. This indicates lack of knowledge about the means of prevention of infection. Also in the Pakistan survey, knowledge about hepatitis B vaccine was not satisfactory among study groups [11]. This is contrary to the findings of [13]. Who found that the majority of the medical students (97.2%) had received Hepatitis B vaccination.

Our results show that there is a positive correlation between age and the degree of knowledge, and that the 4th year students had the highest mean knowledge score. In a study conducted by [20]. On medical students of Delhi to measure their level of information about hepatitis A and B, a questionnaire including information on hepatitis B vaccine, its transmission, symptoms and prevention, was distributed among the first, third and last year students. The results showed that senior students had the highest level of information compared with other two groups [21].

We conclude that knowledge and attitude of university students in our region is partial too weak in those groups of students of non-biological sciences who have less close contact with the patients.

Financial support

The study was carried out under the Research Grant Agreement (TC/4/Health-2010-hep-3271) between Science and Technology Development Fund (STDF) of Egypt and the Faculty of Medicine, Suez Canal University.

  1. Kamal SM, Abdelhakam SA. Hepatitis C in Developing Countries. J Academic Press. 2018; 41-56.
  2. Westbrook RH, Dusheiko G. Natural history of hepatitis C J Hepatol. 2014; 4: 61: 58–68.[PubMed]
  3. Central Agency for Public Mobilization and Statistics, CAPMAS [webpage on the Internet]. Statistical Yearbook – National Accounts: Expenditure on GDP at Market 12/13 – 14/15.
  4. Kermode M, Holmes W, Langkham B, Thomas MS, Gifford S. HIV related knowledge, attitudes and risk perception amongst nurses, doctors and other healthcare workers in rural India. J Indian J Med Res. 2005; 122: 258–64.[PubMed]
  5. Nagao Y, Matsuoka H, Kawaguchi T, Ide T, Sata M. HBV and HCV infection in Japanese dental care workers. J Int J Mol Med. 2008; 21: 791–9.[PubMed]
  6. May MT, Justice AC, Birnie K, Ingle SM, Smith C, et al. Injection drug use and hepatitis C as a risk factor for mortality in HIV infected individuals: the antiretroviral therapy cohort. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr. 2015; 69: 348-354.[PubMed]
  7. Okoroiwu HU, Okafor IM, Asemota EA, Okpokam DC. Seroprevalence of transfusion-transmissible infections (HBV, HCV, syphilis and HIV) among prospective blood donors in a tertiary health care facility in calabar, nigeria; an eleven years evaluation. J BMC Public Health. 2018; 18: 645.[PubMed]
  8. Reis C, Heisler M, Amowitz LL, Moreland RS, Mafeni JO, et al. Discriminatory attitudes and practices by health workers toward patients with HIV/AIDS in Nigeria. J PLoS Med. 2005; 2: 246.[PubMed]
  9. D’Souza RF, Glynn MJ, Alstead E, Osonayo C, Foster GR. Knowledge of chronic hepatitis C among East London primary care physicians following the Department of Health's educational campaign. J QJM. 2004; 97: 331–6.[PubMed].
  10. Askarian M, Yadollahi M, Kuochak F, Danaei M, Vakili V, et al. Precautions for health care workers to avoid hepatitis B and C virus infection. Int J Occup Environ Med. 2011; 2: 191-8 [PubMed]
  11. Higher Education the Arab States. Munir Bashshur, UNESCO Regional Bureau for Education in the Arab States, Bairut-Lebanon. 2004.
  12. Razi A, ur Rahman R, Naz S, Ghafoor F, Ullah Khan MA. Knowledge attitude and practices of university students regarding hepatitis B and C J ARPN Journal of Agricultural and Biological Science. 2010; 5: 38-43.
  13. Ghahramani F, Mohammadbeigi A, Mohammadsalehi N. A survey of the students’ knowledge about hepatitis. J Hepat Mon. 2006; 6: 59-62.
  14. Joukar F, Mansour-Ghanaei F, Soati F, Meskinkhoda P. Knowledge level and attitudes of health care professionals toward patients with hepatitis C infection. J World J Gastroenterol. 2010; 18: 2238-2244.[PubMed]
  15. Ghanaei R, Joukar F, Souti F, Atrkar-Roushan Z. Knowledge and attitude of medical science students toward hepatitis B and C infections. J Int J Clin Exp Med. 2013; 6: 197-205.[PubMed]
  16. Todorova TT, Gabriela Tsankova GT, Sankova DT, Kostadinova CV, Lodozova N. knowledge and attitude towards hepatitis b and hepatitis c among dental medicine students. J IMAB. 2015; 21: 810 – 813.
  17. Abdal M, Al-Mousa K. Knowledge, Attitude, and Practice of HBV vaccination among dentists in primary health care, dental centers and Kuwait university dental clinics ( KUDCs). 2013; 1-23.
  18. Reddy RS, Swapna LA, Ramesh T, Pradeep K. Knowledge, attitude and practice on hepatitis B prevention among dental professionals in India. J Brazilian J Oral Sci. 2011; 10: 241-245.
  19. Kadeh H, Saravani S, Golzari P. Knowledge, Attitude and Practice of Dentists towards Patients with HIV, Hepatitis B and Hepatitis C Infections. J Avicenna J Dent Res. 2014; 6: 21348.
  20. Younis BB, Khan GM, Akhtar P, Chaudhary MA.Vaccination against hepatitis B among doctors at a teaching hospital at Lahore. Pak. J Med Sci. 2001; 17: 229-232.
  21. Chhabra P, Grover VL, Agrawal KD. Do our medical students have enough knowledge of hepatitis B? A Delhi based study. J Commun Dis. 2005; 4: 221-225. [PubMed].