Effect on Vitamin D status of Breastfeeding Infants after Vitamin D3 Supplementation during Breastfeeding Lactation: A double-blind randomized controlled trial

Background: Vitamin D defi ciency in pregnancy increases several risks of breastfed mothers. To prevent these adverse events, vitamin D supplementation during pregnancy and lactation is recommended, but suggested dose ranges vary. Objective: To determine whether vitamin D3 1,800 IU/d supplementation in lactating mothers improves the vitamin D status of their breastfed infants. Materials and Methods: A randomized, placebo–controlled trial with Thai pregnant women was conducted. Lactating mothers (n=72) and their breastfed infants with insuffi cient maternal 25 hydroxyvitamin D (25(OH)D) levels in the third trimester were randomly assigned to two groups, one of which received 1,800 IU/d vitamin D supplementation and the other a placebo. Maternal serum 25(OH)D during lactation, cord blood, and 6-week breastfed infant serum were measured using LC-MS/MS. Results: Mean maternal age (±SD) was 27±5 years, and pre-gestational BMI was 22.29±5 kg/m2. Maternal serum 25(OH)D at baseline was 22.29±7.15 nmol/L. At 6 weeks, both maternal 25(OH)D and infant 25 (OH) D levels had increased signifi cantly in the vitamin D supplement group of mothers and infants (68.30±15.40, 40.40±12.56 nmol/L) compared to those in placebo groups (55.15±13.57, 24.28±17.20 nmol/L) (p <0.001, p<0.001). The changes in infant 25(OH)D levels increased substantially in the vitamin D supplement group but decreased in placebo(17.49±16.27 ng/ml compared to -1.34±19.23 nmol/L in the placebo group, p<0.001). The change of maternal 25(OH)D were positively correlation to the change of 25(OH)D level in breastmilk mothers and infants by r=0.697, p<0.001 and r=0.379, p=0.003 respectively. Conclusions: Vitamin D3 supplementation to breastfed mother during lactation can increase serum 25(OH) D level in Thai breastfed mother and infants. Further work is needed to determine the optimum duration of vitamin D supplementation to normalized breastfed infants with 25(OH)D level >75 nmol/L. Research Article Effect on Vitamin D status of Breastfeeding Infants after Vitamin D3 Supplementation during Breastfeeding Lactation: A double-blind randomized controlled trial Sathit Niramitmahapanya1*, Surasak Kaoiean2, Varaporn Sangtawesin3, Anusorn Patpanaprapan1, Narisa K Bordeerat4 and Chaicharn Deerochanawong1 1Endocrinology and Metabolism Unit , Department of Medicine, Rajavithi Hospital, College of Medicine, Rangsit University, Bangkok, Thailand 2Division of Maternal-Fetal Medicine, Department Obstetrics and Gynecology, Rajavithi Hospital, College of Medicine, Rangsit University, Bangkok, Thailand 3Assistant Professor of Neonatal Unit, Queen Sirikit National Institute of Child Health, College of Medicine, Rangsit University, Bangkok, Thailand 4Department of Medical Technology, Faculty of Allied Health Science, Thammasat University, Phathumthani, Thailand *Address for Correspondence: Dr. Sathit Niramitmahapanya, Endocrinology and Metabolism Unit, Department of Medicine, Rajavithi Hospital, College of Medicine, Rangsit University, Bangkok, Thailand, 10400, Tel: +662 3545105; Fax: +662-3548179; Email: maisathit@hotmail.com Submitted: 20 July 2017 Approved: 02 August 2017 Published: 04 August 2017 Copyright: 2017 Niramitmahapanya S, et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited


INTRODUCTION
In children, long-term overt vitamin D de iciency leads to rickets with signi icant skeletal deformities and poor growth. Additionally, low vitamin D status at birth and in infancy has recently been linked to an increased risk of acute lower respiratory tract infections including respiratory syncytial virus infections [1][2][3]. The sources of vitamin D in breastfeeding infants are come from previous placental transfer, human milk and sunlight exposure. The vitamin D stores in the infant at birth depend on maternal vitamin D status during pregnancy and start physiologically with transplacental transfer of vitamin D as 25(OH)D [4]. It is well-known that there is a positive correlation between maternal and cord blood 25(OH)D concentrations, and, generally, the cord blood 25(OH)D level is between 50% and 80% of the maternal value [4]. Despite an abundance of sunshine, studies from the Middle East show that there is a high prevalence of vitamin D de iciency in women of childbearing age, mainly attributed to cultural avoidance of sunlight, traditional dress styles that cover most of the body while outdoors, and inadequate vitamin D intake [5,6]. Because the vitamin D status of the mother during pregnancy is important in determining the vitamin D status of the infant at birth, the strong relationship between maternal and cord blood vitamin D status [4] and vitamin D de iciency during pregnancy should be of concern, especially if the mother is planning to exclusively breastfeed.
In 2003, the American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP) published a guideline recommending that all children older than two months receive 200 IU of supplemental vitamin D daily [7]. Subsequently, in 2008, the AAP issued an updated recommendation that all infants, children and adolescents receive a minimum of 400 IU of vitamin D daily through diet or supplements [8]. Infants who are breastfed should receive 400 IU of supplemental vitamin D daily [9][10][11][12][13]. Risk factors for vitamin D de iciency in infants were being exclusively breastfed without vitamin D supplementation; insuf icient sunlight exposure; and low maternal vitamin D during pregnancy.
Vitamin D drops which are preferable for infants are not available in Thailand, and for this reason, vitamin D de iciency or insuf iciency may occur during pregnancy and may increase the risk of abnormal fetal growth and bone development. It is still not clear whether supplemental vitamin D during the lactation phase of exclusive breastfeeding can improve the vitamin D status of infants. Our study aimed to determine whether vitamin D 3 1,800 IU/d supplementation in lactating mothers improves the vitamin D status of their breastfed infants. The primary objective of this study was to compare 25 (OH)D levels of breastfed infants assigned vitamin D (VD) at 6 weeks postpartum with those given a placebo. The secondary aim was to compare levels of 25 (OH)D of maternal serum and breast milk in the vitamin D and placebo groups at 6 weeks postpartum.

Material
Two hundred pregnancies at the third trimester were enrolled in this study at Rajavithi Hospital, Bangkok. The parent protocol was approved by Ethics Committee of Rajavithi Hospital and the Ethics Committee of Queen Sirikit National Institute of Child Health, Bangkok, Thailand. All of the mothers delivered singleton infant at term (>37 weeks) and planned to breastfeed their infants for over 2 months postpartum. Mothers who had 25(OH)D level <25nmol/L and > 75 nmol/L were excluded from this study. Healthy mothers were recruited from those who delivered at Rajavithi Hospital in Bangkok, Thailand between October 2013 and September 2014.
The vitamin D3 supplement pills used in this study were designed by the single commercial company in Bangkok and made from dried product of vitamin D3 of approximately 1,800 IU/capsule. A nurse at the antepartum unit was assigned to register more than 300 mothers into this study as shown in igure 1. After consent had been obtained, mothers' serum levels of 25(OH)D at the third trimester were checked and those who had 25(OH)D levels between 25 to 75 nmol/L were included in the study. 72 term infants of mothers with insuf iciency vitamin D status were enrolled by research assistant of icer into this study after delivery at Rajavithi Hospital if breastfeeding was planned for more than 2 months. Registered of icers randomly assigned vitamin D3 and placebo capsules to breastfed mothers, and the obstetric physician was blinded to the participants' study arms. Cord blood, serum, urine and breast milk after delivery were collected from 102 mothers. At six weeks postpartum, 68 mother-infant pairs visited the postpartum clinic to complete demographic data and follow-up questionnaires, and mothers' blood, infants' blood (5 mL), breast milk and mothers' urine were collected. 8 mothers were excluded from the study because of inadequate breast milk volume, and 26 motherinfant pairs were lost to follow-up at the 6-week appointment igure 1. In case of 4 withdrawal participants, the reasons by 2 mothers were loss follow up, an infant was neonatal sepsis and another infant was neonatal jaundice.

Method
Blood samples were drawn by venipuncture from mothers and infants, and the mothers' urine and breast milk were collected and placed in the same container labeled with the date and the participants' names. The samples were frozen at -80ºc and send to Department of Medical Technology, Faculty of Allied Health Science, Thammasat University. Serum concentration of 25(OH)D of both mothers and infants were measured by the LC-MS/MS technique, Breast milk 25(OH)D levels were measured by the HPLC method, and vitamin D binding protein (VDBP) levels were measured by the solid phase sandwich ELISA method (R&D Systems, Minneapolis, MN). For this assay, the manufacturer's reported intra-assay and inter-assay CV's are 6.2 and 7.4%. The assay measured between 89-102% of exogenous VDBP added to human serum and has no signi icant cross-reactivity with human albumin, vitamin D3, or alfafetoprotein. Blood samples were available to measure serum intact parathyroid hormone (iPTH) using the chemiluminescence microparticle immunoassay (Abbott Diagnostics, U.S.A.) in Rajavithi Hospital for the same sample of mothers and infants. For iPTH assay, the detection limit was 4 pg/mL and has 0.01% cross-reactivity with 100,000 pg/mL.
Follow-up questionnaires collected prospectively for the purpose of this study during the interview included socio-demographics, maternal skin color, maternal vitamin D supplementation and sunlight exposure behavior in mothers. During the study, mothers were contacted weekly by telephone by nurses who were experts in breastfeeding to ensure that infants were being breastfed and to resolve any breastfeeding problems until the 6-week postpartum visit. Sun exposure behavior was assessed by duration of sun exposure (hours/day) in the week prior to the interview. Both physicians and enrolled of icers were blinded to the study arms of all participants.

STATISTICAL ANALYSIS
The variables of the study were maternal 25(OH)D breast milk levels, maternal 25(OH)D levels, and infants' 25(OH)D levels at delivery and 6 weeks postpartum. ANOVA was use to compare mothers and infants by group at the baseline and 6 weeks postpartum stages. We also compared selected maternal socio-demographic factors, dose of other source of vitamin D supplementation, sun exposure behavior, and mothers' skin color of the two groups using nonparametric statistical tests. Correlation analysis was performed to assess for the relationships among the changes in maternal vitamin D status, in breast milk vitamin D and in breastfed infant vitamin D status. Signi icant p value less than 0.05 was set as statistical signi icant. Analysis was done with the software program SPSS for Windows version 17.0(SPSS Inc., Chicago, Illinois, USA).

RESULTS
The two study groups were same as preliminary results [14] include gestational age, proportion of male infant and urine calcium (Supplement Data). Gestational ages ranged from 37-41 weeks at enrollment. Mean (±SD) baseline serum 25(OH)D values were 56.1±13.9 nmol/L in mothers (range 25.4-87 nmol/L) and 24.8±12.1 nmol/L in infants (range 6.8-64.5 nmol/L) as previous report [14]. Maternal 25(OH)D level at delivery, cord blood 25(OH)D level, Colostrum 25(OH)D level and proportion of normal labor not showed any signi icant difference in both groups. Postpartum maternal 25(OH)D concentrations in the mothers and their infants at 6 weeks postpartum were positively correlated (r=0.44; p=0.001).

Maternal outcome
Baseline maternal age, 25(OH)D concentrations, vitamin D binding protein levels and gestational age were greater in the placebo group. Maternal serum 25(OH)D values increased in the vitamin D groups from baseline to day 42 (6 weeks)( Table 1), and this incremental change in maternal serum 25(OH)D was signi icantly greater in the vitamin D group than in the controls. Breast milk cholecalciferol concentrations mirrored serum concentrations, with increased serum values at 6 weeks postpartum in the vitamin D group only(p=0.005) ( Table 1).

Infant outcome
At birth, the cord blood concentrations of 25(OH)D were similar in the two groups. Birth weight, head circumference, length, Apgar score at 1 and 5 minutes, and the number of males were very similar (Supplement data). At 6 weeks postpartum, serum infant 25(OH)D levels and the change of infant serum 25(OH)D had signi icantly increased in the vitamin D group as shown in table 1 while other infant data such as head circumference, body weight, body length and serum calcium were not signi icantly different(data not shown) in the two groups ( Table 1)

DISCUSSION
The purpose of the present study was to evaluate the possibility of vitamin D supplementation of breastfed infants through their mothers. Our study suggests that the milk of the vitamin D-supplemented mother may prevent infant osteomalacia (rickets) only if the dose given to the mother is large enough (1800IU/day). Prenatal and postnatal supplementation is advised for all infants by the Endocrine Society Clinical Practice Guidelines [15]. Previous studies have shown that high proportions of Malay and Thai pregnant woman are at risk of vitamin D de iciency [16,17], despite living in a country with plenty of sunshine, the majority of women in South East Asian countries had inadequate vitamin D levels of 25(OH)D (<75 nmol/L). A recent study [17] demonstrated that the prevalence of vitamin D inadequacy was 83.8%, 30.9% and 27.4% for irst, second and third trimesters respectively. Vitamin D inadequacy is common in pregnant Thai women, and while vitamin D supplementation at 400 IU/ day is likely to prevent vitamin D de iciency in mothers, it is unable to prevent vitamin D insuf iciency status in mothers even at 800 IU/day. Our results showed maternal vitamin D insuf iciency status in the placebo group was 56.1 nmol/L at delivery period and 55.2 nmol/L at the 6-week postpartum period.
In a previous report, when mothers received 200 IU of vitamin D a day, the 25(OH) D concentration of breastfed infants was almost equal to that of infants receiving 400 IU/day directly [18]. The maternal 25(OH)D levels during the course of pregnancy showed a signi icant increase from the second to the third trimester [16,17]. As reported previously, 25(OH)D levels are relatively unaffected by pregnancy despite the increase in calcitriol levels and the passage of 25(OH)D across the placenta to the fetus [19].
Another study has suggested that human milk alone may provide suf icient dietary vitamin D for the needs of term infants under optimal social and environmental circumstances [20]. The dose of 900 IU of vitamin D daily [21] is not high enough to adequately boost breastfed infants' 25(OH)D levels, and even 1,000 IU/day is not suf icient [18], on the other hand, a double-blind study in South African showed a   clear improvement in infant 25(OH)D concentration with 500 IU of daily vitamin D supplementation through the mother [22]. Our results suggest that 1,800IU of daily vitamin D3 supplementation in the mother can prevent vitamin D de iciency status in breastfed infants.
During an eight-week lactation period in another study, maternal 1α, 25 (OH)D decreased to normal adult concentrations and remained quite constant thereafter [23]. In our study, six-week lactation showed a signi icant increase in breast milk 25(OH) D levels in the vitamin D-supplemented group, although this may have been due to the lower levels of colostrum 25(OH)D level in the vitamin D group compared to the placebo one. One infant in the vitamin D supplement group igure 2 did not show an incremental change of 25(OH)D levels, and this be a result of individual genetic variation, baseline of 25(OH)D level, an error in the measure and/or a lack of adherence to treatment.
There were some limitations of this study. First, the number of participants was quite small and there were several complicated stages in the collection and storage of specimens so that we were unable to show any correlation between the change of breast milk 25(OH)D levels and the change of infant 25(OH)D levels . Second, the method used to detect 25(OH)D level in breast milk was the HPLC technique which may interfere with proteins in breast milk. This study, however, was well designed to test the hypothesis and to study correlations among maternal breast milk and infant 25(OH)D levels between the vitamin D-supplemented group and the placebo one.

CONCLUSION
The vitamin D in breast milk is not suf icient to represent a secure way of vitamin D suf iciency status in Thai infants. A supplementation of vitamin D3 to the breastfed infant is not achieved to 25(OH)D to suf iciency status which we need more detail in further study. As this dose of vitamin D3 supplementation is quite high for lactating mothers, it has not previously been recommended for Thai lactating mothers.