Comparative study of continuous method and interrupted method of episiotomy in terms of healing of the surgical wound

Episiotomy is a surgical enlargement of the vaginal ori ice by an incision to the perineum during the last part of the second stage of labour. This procedure is performed with sterile scissors or scalpel and requires repair by suturing [1]. Seven different types of episiotomy have been described in the literature, but no standardized practice exists in terms of point of origin, angle of the cut and the length of the incision [2]. The most common types are mediolateral and midline episiotomy incisions.


Introduction
Episiotomy is a surgical enlargement of the vaginal ori ice by an incision to the perineum during the last part of the second stage of labour. This procedure is performed with sterile scissors or scalpel and requires repair by suturing [1]. Seven different types of episiotomy have been described in the literature, but no standardized practice exists in terms of point of origin, angle of the cut and the length of the incision [2]. The most common types are mediolateral and midline episiotomy incisions.
Eighty-ive percent of women who have a spontaneous vaginal birth will have some form of perineal trauma and up to 69% will need to have sutures [3,4].
Despite this, repair of the perineum continues to be an aspect of childbirth that affects a great number of women and can produce maternal morbidity. The majority of women experience pain of short duration as a result of perineal repair after birth and some continue with long-term problems, such as sexual discomfort [5][6][7][8].
In addition to the extent of the trauma, the surgical skill

Abstract
Episiotomy is a most commonly performed minor procedure. There are various type of episiotomy suturing, in this study two most common types of episiotomy suturing techniques were compare in terms of healing rate. This study concluded that the continuous method of episiotomy suturing is although faster, cosmetically better and associated with less post-operative pain but it heals signifi cantly better than interrupted method of suturing.
[9], the type of material used [10], and the suture technique for perineal repair after childbirth can have an important effect on the magnitude and degree of morbidity experienced by women after repair. Complications rely upon severity of the perineal trauma and on effectiveness of treatment. Also type of suturing material, the choice of repair technique, and skills of the operator are the three primary components in luence the result of the perineal repair. Type of repairing may affect pain and healing. The best method for episiotomy repair should require less time to perform and less utilization of materials and produces less pain in short and in long term period [11]. Although there are various techniques to close the incision of episiotomy, haemostasis and restoration of anatomical structure of the incision site without additional suture are fundamental aspects of success in all methods. At present, two common methods of repair include continuous and interrupted methods [12].
In this study we have compared healing of two different methods of episiotomy suturing.

Aims and objectives
Comparison between continuous and interrupted suturing method in terms of healing.

A. Study method
• The Present study is a prospective comparative study which was conducted in MGM Hospital, Kalamboli, Navi Mumbai, India from 1 st January 2019 to 31 st December 2020 after approval by ethical committee.

B. Number of cases
• A total of 200 cases were selected.
• Eligible patients were randomly allocated into two groups: Interrupted suturing • Parts cleaned and draped.
• Proper visualization of apex is visualized, irst stich is started 1 cm above the apex, • Vaginal epithelium is approximated in a continuous locking manner up to a fourchette and ended with surgical knots.
• Re-approximation of the bulbospongiosus and supericial transverse perineal muscles during restoration of the perineal body is done with 3-4 simple sutures. Figure of 8 sutures can be taken to achieve hemostasis.

Continuous Suturing
• Parts cleaned and draped.
• Proper visualization of the apex is visualized, the irst stitch is started 1 cm above the apex, • Vaginal epithelium approximated in a continuous locking manner up to the fourchette, and entered into the muscular layer.
• Re-approximation of the bulbospongiosus and super icial transverse perineal muscles during restoration of the perineal body is done with continuous non-locking manner. Up to the apex of skin.
• Skin is approximated in a subcuticular manner from below upwards and the suture is tied with a surgical knot at fourchette and the episiotomy is completed in a single continuous suturing.
The inal outcome will be studied on Day 1, Day 2 and Day 3 of delivery by Reeda Scoring method (SHORT TERM).

Results
Statistical analysis of the data collected is as follows, where group A is Interrupted method of suturing group and group B is continuous method of suturing.

Age:
Most of the patients were primi gravida in both the study group with 46% in group A and 39% in group B. While 35% were 2 nd gravida in group A and 36% in group B. 12% were 3 rd gravida in group A while 19% in group B. 6% and 5% were 4 th gravida in group A and group B respectively. Only 1% were 5 th gravida in both the groups. Gestational Age: Mean gestational age in group A was 38.23 weeks, and in group B it was 38.48 weeks.

REEDA Score:
Descriptive Statistics: Test of Normality: Interpretation: p -value less than that of 0.05 indicates that data is not distributed normally.    Mann-Whitney U test Comparison of REEDA Score: Interpretation: Since p -value is less than that of 0.05 indicates that the average score of Group A and Group B differ signi icantly. The average score in Group A is signi icantly more than Group B.
Interpretation: Since p -value is less than that of 0.05 indicates that the average score of group A and group B differ signi icantly on all three days, Day 1, 2 and 3. The average score in group A is signi icantly more than group B.

Discussion
In our study, we have attempted to compare the results of the two different episiotomy techniques i.e., continuous method and interrupted method. This study is aimed to determine the ef icacy of the two methods in terms of healing. two years. Following are the observations from our study and a correlation with studies conducted in the past in medical literature.
A comparison was done between the age of the patients among the two study groups. The mean age in Group A was 24.45 years whereas in Group B was 24.66 years. The p -value being 0.736. The difference was considered to be statistically not signi icant.
Mean Gravidity in group A and Group B is 1.81 and 1.93 respectively. p -value being 0.366 which is statistically not signi icant.
A comparison was done between the gestational age at delivery between the two study groups. The mean gestational age in Group A was 38.23 and that in Group B was 38.48. p -value was 0.663. The difference was considered to be statistically not signi icant.
These indings are similar to the study conducted by Martínez-Galiano, et al. [15] where gestational age of the patients undergoing episiotomy was statistically not signi icant.
In our study, the mean REEDA score for healing of episiotomy in group A on day 1 was 3.60, Day 2 was 2.90, and Day 3 was 2.19. Mean REEDA score in Group B on Day 1 was 3.07, day 2 was 2.47, day 3 was 1.83, with p -value on Day 1, 2, and 3 being 0.005, 0.009, and 0.037 respectively which was signi icant.
Similar studies done by Nagure, et al. [16] showed a mean value of REEDA score of 3.6 with continuous group and 4.5 with interrupted group on day 3 with a p -value 0.000 which was found signi icant.

Conclusion
Hence from this study results continuous suturing heals better.